To find the definition for any word on this page double click it!
Expose` of Crimes Volume V - Statements of Issues, Jurisdictions, Money, Amendments 13 and 14 and their effect,
The Expose` Volumes are actual briefings submitted into state and federal courts during the course of hearings/proceedings. These use government, court, other's research and documentations, and historical records to support the facts extended.
Though these were briefings, read together, they constitute a book called " The Stupification of America ". All points raised are argued from differring sides in the series, so to understand the full impact and not be mis-led into thinking any one volume/briefing is a final answer, one must read all the volumes/briefings.
Make sure to scroll to the end of the document to view the References/Authorities used during the creation of the individual Volume.
Moreover, take specific note: the attorneys on the opposing side were REQUIRED to submit counter briefings {which they did not} or the court must accept the presents as fact and/or controlling. ALL judges chose to ignore the procudural rules and law, and ignored the briefings.
The first volumes are presented as they were originally into Ohio and Kentucky courts, though they were also presented into the federal cases.
In the constitutional Courts of record, AND To The People's Grand and petite Juries and before the People
Maurice Edward, Brahier's Notices and Advisement - JURIS ET DE JURE
No waiver of Rights included, extended, or otherwise, herein or hereon
Introduced solely in protection of Rights and Constitutions, and the responsibilities and duties therein defined and mandated
IN EXPOSE` OF FRAUD, PERJURY, MISDEMEANORS, TREASONABLE ACTS, AND OTHER
VOLUME V
IN ADDENDUM TO THE PREVIOUS VOLUMES of this memorandum/expose`
CASE NUMBER: ________________________________________
BRIEFED ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE
The reason I personally became an investigator was due to these cases in which the law, rules, codes, etc. of justice were tossed aside.
NOTICES and Advisement
Referenced as supposed Court No. 91-DC-000792 and residuals
GAIL BRAHIER
VS.
MAURICE BRAHIER
OTHER REFERENCE MATTERS
OHIO Appeals concerning the above case:
92-G-1705;
93-G-1825,
2000-G-2269
Disciplinary Counsel records of Supreme Court of Ohio:
1121;
1121J,
94-1688J;
other
Federal District Court cases:
5:94-CV-00035;
5:95-CV-201R;
5:95-CV-241J;
5:96-CV-281(P)R;
97-5567 6th App; others,
other records:
OHIO
Ohio Attorney General in Advisement/request for investigation 1992-1995; and pursuant all United States cases;
Ohio Governor Advisement 1992-1995; and pursuant all United States cases;
Secretary of State - Ohio - Advisement 1992 - 1995 and pursuant all United States cases;
And others, such as: Lake County Prosecutors Office, Geauga County Prosecutors Office
UNITED STATES
Request for Investigation in Office of The President of The United States - 02/1995 and additional;
Request for investigation to The United States Attorney General Office, Washington, D.C. and Kentucky and Ohio local Offices, 1992-2/1995;
Justice Department, Washington, D.C., request for investigations and direction to investigate, 2/1995;
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Ohio and Kentucky, request to investigate, 1992-1995;
Pentagon, Washington, D.C., questions for general review within the Military, 1995;
The House and Senate - Advisement - 1993 - 1995
Solicitor General pursuant various cases Supreme Court
And elsewhere, such as United States Marshals Service
And the Kentucky resultant cases:
98-M-00668; 98-CR-00120; 96-CR-00050; 96-5313; 98-SC-916-OA; and letters, documents, etc. to Governor; Attorney General; Secretary of State; Supreme Court, other
Additionally, The Supreme Court of The United States Of America was petitioned for review, or demand, or complaint, on occasions. 1995, 1997, 1999, 2000 and 2002 (breach of contract)
Summary of 5:03-CV-258-R
In 2003 the case (Brahier v. Brahier) was finally shown as fraudulent and criminal in nature (though the evidence has existed on the record for twelve years), in the very court which actively participated in the original fraud and criminal activities. In the seventh (7th) month of 2003 these facts brought finality in the finding of facts phase. The case no longer held any authority or viability.
What the court and judges and every other party whom was contacted had ignored or covered up for 12 years (evidence existing on the face of the record throughout those years); the criminal activity by Gail S. Brahier and her witnesses, the attorneys, the judge and others, in the original trial; brought the factors of their active direct and or indirect participation for those twelve years in these unlawful and illegal activities, as fact.
Damages were sought, however, all courts and other parties contacted in Ohio had actively participated or failed or refused to provide their duties and responsibilities; all judges in the Common Pleas Court had participated, Eleventh District Court of Appeals had participated, and Supreme Court of Ohio had participated; leaving no court available in Ohio.
Of course, Ohio has a decided interest in ensuring these fraudulent and criminal activities and resultant damages, recovery, etceteras (as does Commonwealth of Kentucky and the federal District Court in Western District of Kentucky, as they also actively participated) are not applied. The fact of this unlawful activity was presented as early as 1993 to the federal system (5:94-CV-00035) in Western Kentucky, and was deliberately and fraudulent handled by that court and various magistrate and or judges over the course of ten or so years in the various cases submitted there. Even denying of a Writ of Habeas Corpus, while I was being held unlawfully in prison.
A new federal case was instituted on November 20, 2003 listed as 5:03-CV-258-R in Federal District Court- Western Kentucky [DCUS], which deals with the fact that numerous unlawful and unconstitutional activities have been perpetrated upon myself for over 12 years in an action to remove the recovery of damages, costs, fees, etceteras, from Ohio to federal court. Motion to Transfer governed by 28 USC: 1343, 1441, 1443, 1449, 1602, 1631, 1657; 18 USC: 241, 245, 371, 402, 1001, 1018, 1028, 1621, 1623, 1505, 1506, 1512, 1513, 2071, 2383, 2384, 3041, 3052, 3053, 3251, 3237; State and national Constitutional contracts, and other, with reasons, etceteras, was filed.
Volumes I, II, III, and VIII were filed, and review of Ohio and Kentucky Records was requested. Both state records contain additional materials, and factual basis for recovery, as both states refused to comply with law (state and federal), constitutional protections (state and national), and other factors as exposed within those records. In the suggested Order(s) (filed January 14, 2004), find direction to United States Attorney's Office to investigate defendants for criminal prosecution.
The matter was supposedly dismissed on [03-10-04 - file date] by UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT [USDC] which had no jurisdiction to handle the case, being a territorial court, as so previously Noticed (filed January 28, 2004) to the supposed judge whom had unlawfully intruded.
Deliberately fraudulent reasons presented in Memorandum in support of this deliberately criminal and fraudulent Order attempting to dismiss the Motion to Transfer included statements concerning:
a [non-existent] complaint;
and a supposed failure to establish:
(a)the contract which the courts and governments are in breach of [Note specifically four (4) Volumes of Expose` in records at that time which contain contract law, constitutional contracts, etceteras];
(b)jurisdiction of the federal court [jurisdiction arose from, and was established by, violations of state and federal law and constitutions, civil rights-See Volumes of this Expose`];
(c)jurisdiction over the defendants [any federal court has jurisdiction over any United States citizens, government employees, officials, officers, etceteras (state and federal), moreover, they have distinct responsibility for the unlawful actions these parties might pursue; Article 1 Sec. 8 of The Constitution of The United States and attending statutory law];
(d)diversity of citizenship of the parties [28 USC 1332]; which is required only for complaint, though Notice was placed concerning the complete diversity, all defendants are United States citizens [United States private subject class], I am a state Citizen and national Citizen by birth [primary constitutional class];
(e)failure to establish constitutional questions - See Volumes;
(f)failure to establish federal law violations, again see Volumes and records of these cases.
3. prior Notice included the fact that this district court was the court which had handled all federal cases, and which had been defiled by this unlawful, unconstitutional, and criminal activity (court of first contact; defilement and destruction of United States law and justice system; fraud);
Those four (4) Volumes in the record at that time were Volumes I, II, III, & VIII.
USDC had no lawful authority to intrude in the Motion to Transfer the Ohio action, as USDC jurisdiction is non-existent in that case at bar, making this a completely unlawful activity by the judge and writer of this memorandum, done without jurisdiction. (SEE: Notices and Notice of and Questions of Law and Expose` Volumes)
Moreover, no federal court is allowed to exist as a several state court as both are foreign to each other (separation of authority and powers-state and national constitutional contracts and U.S. Code). On page 1; I SUMMARY OF CLAIMS of the Memorandum note this statement "...who preside over courts in our commonwealth." at line three (3) thereunder. Explicitly showing the alinement with state courts, and conspiracy to work with the defendants in unlawful, unconstitutional and criminal activities.
Yet DCUS may share concurrent jurisdiction in some circumstances, such as the MOTION TO TRANSFER the Ohio matter [in light of laws and constitutions]. However, USDC has no constituted authority or jurisdiction over these shared jurisdictions, nor may it be giving such -SEE generally jurisdiction-Expose` Volumes and Notices and other in court records. Moreover, original jurisdiction resided in DCUS.
The above prompted submission of Notices including Formal complaint, and Notice of and Questions of Law, to combat this unlawful encroachment upon the case and the readily apparent active criminal collusion and conspiracy which has continued for ten or so years.
Volume IV was submitted (mail date-03-15-04) with the Notices and complaint, making five (5) Volumes then in public court records.
The above Notices, Formal Complaint, and Request for forms (Judicial Misconduct forms and criminal complaint forms) (filed March 19, 2004) to bring charges against Thomas B. Russell (a judge whom had deliberately mishandled this case and prior cases) was served (via mail-filed) upon the clerks of the district court [DCUS] and the court itself. No forms were returned by the clerk.
On 03-27-04, I contacted, via voice mail, the U.S. Attorney's Office in Louisville, Kentucky advising such of criminal activities in that district court, and Patricia Elder of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals requesting forms for judicial misconduct. On Tuesday, March 30, of 2004 I contacted, via phone, the Sixth Circuit Court, call forwarded to the 6th Circuit Executive Office to obtain proper forms for official misconduct complaint.
-- ---
"28 USC 1441. Actions removable generally
Except as otherwise provided by Act of Congress, any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where such action is pending.
Any civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction founded on a claim or right arising under the Constitution, treaties or laws of the United States shall be removable without regard to the citizenship or residence of the parties. Any other such action shall be removable only if none of the parties in interest properly joined and served as defendants is a citizen of the State in which such action is brought.'
'28 USC 1343. Civil Rights
The district court shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action authorized by law to be commenced by any person:
1. ...(concerns United States citizens)
2.To recover any damages from any person who fails to prevent or to aid in preventing any wrong ...which he had knowledge were about to occur and power to prevent;
3. To redress the deprevation, under color of any State law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any right, privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United States or by Act of Congress providing for equal rights of citizens or of all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States." (my note-see 28 USC 1443, 42 USC 1981-2000, and other)
MATERIALS FOR A BASIC COURSE IN CIVIL PROCEDURE - FIELD AND KAPLAN - University Casebook Series (1953) The Foundation Press, Inc. pages 120 & 129 (note: these have been somewhat modified by congress)
--- ---
Of course, by already presented authorities in prior Volumes, the Order (03-10-04 - file date) supposedly on record in Western Kentucky district court is void, ab inito, as it has no basis in law whatsoever, and stands as an affront to law and justice. As it is automatically void and outright fraud, there lay no appellant material (nothing to appeal).
Therefore, this Volume of the Expose` was submitted with Notice of Complaint against Clerks for failing to supply forms, apparent: misprision, obstruction of justice, and other. This Notice also included: question on status of case; whether judge had been found; whether DCUS court had been found; correction of typographical error; and, Notice of submission of this Volume on CDROM. Bringing to public court records, six (6) Volumes of this Expose`.
Having previously addressed the unlawful, unconstitutional, and readily apparent criminal activities in the prior Volumes of this Expose`, we now must address additional material presents, relevant to the matters occurring in the courts, the nation, and the world.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
NOTICES and Advisement*
Summary of 5:03-CV-258-R*
VOLUME V*
Memorandum of ruling Law, cases, exerts, excerpts and other*
Opening Premise*
The reviewers and juries should keep these instructions in mind:*
PRESENTS FOR VOLUME V*
CANONS OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS - AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION*
13. presumptions - More on "MONEY", IMF, WORLD BANK, FED*
Internet Document RE: Jon May*
Reviewing some historical facts we find:*
Our problem?*
Atkins et al. vs. U.S. could be interpreted in various ways.*
MARK THE ABOVE WELL:*
14. The New Constitution for the United States and the world*
INTERNET DOCUMENT-Executive Orders*
15. Liability and prosecution of "officials" and "officers"*
42 USC 1980-2001 and other code, statutes, other*
FEDERAL ACTORS *
Court Jurisdiction & lack of & suit against judge*
16. THE REAL THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT and DEMOCRACY*
Internet Document - RE: Title of Nobility Amendment ratification-money-other*
Questionable activity*
Internet Document- 13th "Nobility" & "Honor" Amendment was ratified twice*
Conclusion-Notice of historical fact:*
Lawyers, Attorneys, and other myths*
Internet Document- Lawyers*
17. Constitutions - State and Federal - generally*
Construction of Constitutions*
14th Amendment citizenship Distinguished from State Citizenship*
Areas identified by ZIP codes are territories:*
14th Amendment cases*
Intent *
Take due Notice:*
Not Affecting State Citizenship*
Congressional Authority Under Amendment 14*
Privileges and Immunities pursuant to a franchise Under 14th Amendment*
Police Powers*
14th Amendment citizenship related to taxation*
Due Process Under the 14th Amendment*
Due Process of 14th Amendment not applicable to State Citizens*
14th Amendment not Constitutionally Ratified by the States*
Presumptions*
Authority*
Judicial Notice of History *
Form of Government- democracy verses republic*
18. THE 14TH AMENDMENT - EQUAL PROTECTION LAW OR TOOL OF USURPATION*
TAKE DUE NOTICE OF THESE HISTORICAL FACTS:*
Notice: We should also take note of the error in the above congressman's statement. His claim was "There is one, and only one, provision of the Constitution of the United States which is forever immutable--which can never be changed or expunged."*
ADDITIONAL QUOTES, EXCERPTS, AND OTHER FOR THIS REVIEW*
Admiralty reference to Volume II - Contracts*
Commerce*
Defined*
Regulation*
ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS_OTHER*
Further on Rights- Refer to other Volumes*
Common Rights*
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT*
Unalienable Rights -(Inalienable Rights)*
Common Law*
Constitutional Law-Common Law - California references*
NOTICE: 'right of property':*
Common Law methods*
Demurrers*
Complaint*
Jurisdictional Facts*
Particular Averments*
Performance of Conditions in Contract Actions*
Complaint based on statute*
In General *
Facts Constituting cause of action*
Conclusions *
ADDEDUM TO Contracts - Volume I & II*
In General*
Statutory Contract*
Contracts Implied in Law*
Quasi-Contracts *
REMEMBER this regarding civil law and history*
Quasi-Contracts as fictions of law*
As Convenience for Remedy in Equity*
Promises Implied in Law*
Benefit and Burden from Contracts*
Performance*
Citizenship-generally and in addendum to Volumes - racial problems*
My advise:*
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES*
VOLUME V
Memorandum of ruling Law, cases, exerts, excerpts and other
Always keep in mind as we explore these materials, these are only a small portion of the collected records, documents, and other, of the People of this nation. When one considers the amount collected across this planet by the People of the world, this is just a 'flyspeck' in comparison. Not only concerning this nation, but others.
In Volumes I and II of this expose` we discussed issues concerning the numerous frauds, collusion, conspiracies, the wars upon the entire civilian population of The United States of America, and other matters of import to the People of this nation, which includes apparent treason against the people, the true United States (of America) referenced in the national constitutional contract, and pursuant state contracts.
In this volume we will review another portion of the continuing effects (train of circumstances) of what is occurring in our nation at and under the hands of the new dictators and their minions. We will also tie segments of this train of circumstantial and hard evidence, of the previously submitted documents together.
I again state that these are presented with the highest intent, under my duty to this nation, the people thereof, and humanity in general, not to unduly harm anyone.
I have used others research when possible; collecting these 'circumstantial evidences' and personal investigations, so that we might bring the totality of them to bare the truth, the facts, and reality.
I give due credit to those whom have spent untold hours, years perhaps, researching, investigating, and trying their best to end these frauds and criminal activities in America. One can see the love they have for this nation, the way it was originally erected, not how it presently is.
Misquotes, and other are unintentional, and do not destroy the validity or importance of these presents. The reviewers should collect or review the actual state and federal documents, and other referenced materials, in their entirety, for complete and proper review, indictment, and prosecution.
I will restate the controlling opening premise below, before continuing, note the additional presents in the premise below, as I have advised you to do previously.
_____________
The Courts, judges, and other parties are hereby mandated, that they are to take due and proper notice of the Constitutions of the states and United States of America and the laws created in support of the Rights therein defined.
Opening Premise
Winston Churchill:
"Men stumble over the truth from time to time, but most pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing happened."
Sixteenth American Jurisprudence Second Edition, Section 177:
"The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail.
This is succinctly stated as follows: `The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.' `Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it...' `No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.'" [Emphasis added]
Well known to a few selected legal circles (and in particular the United States Department of Justice) are the words of United States Special Judge Advocate John A. Bingham Jr., who made arguments at the criminal prosecution of John H. Surratt and other conspirators who were involved logistically with the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln. This Trial took place in Washington, D.C. in 1865:
"A conspiracy is rarely, if ever, proven by positive testimony.
When a crime of high magnitude is about to be perpetrated by a combination of individuals, they do not act openly, but covertly and secretly.
The purpose formed is known only to those who enter into it. Unless one of the conspirators betrays his companions and give evidence against them, their guilt can be proven only by CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE...
It is said by some writers on evidence that circumstances are stronger than positive proof.
A witness swearing positively, it is said, may misapprehend the facts or swear falsely, but that circumstances cannot lie...
It is reasonable that where a body of men assume the attribute of individuality, whether from commercial business or the commission of a crime, that the association should be bound by the acts of one of its members, in carrying out the design."
John A. Bingham Jr. in TRIAL OF THE CONSPIRATORS FOR THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT LINCOLN, ETC., at page 52; in arguments before a Military Commission, delivered June 27 and 28, 1865 [GPO, Washington (1865); quoting on part UNITED STATES VS. COLE, ET AL., 5 McLean 601]; {University of Rochester, RUSH RHEES LIBRARY, Rare Books Room ["Lincoln File-Seward Pamphlets"], Rochester, New York}].
Notice how Conspirators may be proven:
Only by one of the INSIDERS talking (not very likely),
or, by watching their movements and observing the train of circumstances they leave behind them.
We add the below for contemplation in this Expose`. We should always mark these hundreds of presents well, for they produce the truth, when all else appears to indicate lies, deception, and massive fraud.
"The idea prevails with some, indeed it has expression in arguments at the bar, that we have in this country substantially two national governments; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument, by exercising such powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed to...I take leave to say that, if the principles thus announced should ever receive the sanction of a majority of this court, a radical and mischievous change in our system will result. We will, in that event, pass from the era of constitutional liberty guarded and protected by a written constitution into an era of legislative absolutism...It will be an evil day for American Liberty if the theory of a government outside the Supreme Law of the Land finds lodgment in our Constitutional Jurisprudence. No higher duty rests upon this court than to exert its full authority to prevent all violation of the principles of the Constitution."
- Honorable Supreme Court Justice John Harlan in the 1901 case of Downes v. Bidwell.
"Congress exercises its confirmed powers subject to the limitations contained in the Constitution. If a state ratifies or gives consent to any authority which is not specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States, it is null and void. State officials cannot consent to the enlargement of powers of Congress beyond those enumerated in the Constitution."
- Sandra Day O'Conner in the 1992 decision in New York v. United States, 620 F.Supp. 374 (D.C. N.Y. 1985)
"The more intelligent adversaries of the new Constitution admit the force of this reasoning; but they qualify their admission by a distinction between what they call INTERNAL and EXTERNAL taxation. The former they would reserve to the State governments; the latter, which they explain into commercial imposts, or rather duties on imported articles, they declare themselves willing to concede to the federal head."
- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist 36 (emphasis added)
"The privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates the Bill of Rights nor protects all rights of individual citizens. Instead this provision protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; It does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship."
- Jones v. Temmer 829 F. Supp. 1226
The reviewers and juries should keep these instructions in mind:
"Presumptions are deductions or conclusions which the law requires the jury to make under certain circumstances, in the absence of evidence in the case which leads the jury to a different or contrary conclusion.
A presumption continues to exist only so long as it is not overcome or outweighed by evidence in the case to the contrary; but unless and until so outweighed, the jury should find in accordance with the presumption."
E. Devitt et al., in FEDERAL JURY PRACTICE AND INSTRUCTIONS, Section 71.04 (2nd Edition, 1970).
From INTRODUCTION - Agency and Partnership, pages 2 & 3
"There are three grounds upon which civil law acts in giving remedial justice:
One may be required to perform his promises. For this purpose we apply the rules of the law of contracts, which determines whether a promise is obligatory, the extent of its obligations, and consequences if it is not performed. These rules seek enforcement of binding promises either by awarding damages or by requiring specific performance.
The law of torts gives compensation for harm caused to another. The harm may have been caused by an act, or in some cases by failure to perform an obligation created by taking possession of land or chattels, or by a promise to perform which causes another to rely upon it to his harm.
A third ground for liability exists where one has been unjustly enriched at the expense of another, and hence should make restitution. This ground is occasionally the basis of liability in actions between third party and the principal or agent, and frequently in actions between principal and the agent.
Since agency problems involve all three bases of liability, the course necessarily overlaps other first year course, especially those involving torts and contracts. Thus where the agent makes a contract for the principle, it necessary to interpret what the principal directed the agent to do, what other party had reason to believe the agent was authorized to do, and who were the parties to the contract which the agent makes. These are substantially contract problems, and interpretation of the manifestation of the principal is largely in accordance with the rules of interpretation of contracts. But agency agreements have their own peculiarities so that the ordinary rules for interpretation of other contracts cannot be relied upon. Where an agent makes a misrepresentation in dealing with a third person in a transaction for the principal, the problem involves both the rules of torts and contracts, together with special agency difficulties, since the principal may become liable in tort or the contract may be subject to disaffirmance. Where the agent makes a profit out of work done for the principal, or is required to pay the third person because of a transaction entered into for the principal, problems of restitution arise, since the principal in the first of these cases, and the agent in the second, may have cause for indemnity. We also become more or less involved in problems involving procedure, such as those where the doctrine of res judicata is involved. ...it should be noted that although both agency and partnership are consensual relations (that is, relations created by agreement between the parties), the relations are created by rules operating upon the facts, and do not depend upon the intent of the parties to create what they believe to be the relation of agency or of partnership. As in the case of other legal relations, the law creates an agency or a partnership when the parties have acted in such a way that its rules come into operation. ...The fact that the parties are unaware of the consequences, including their own liability, which flow from what they have done, is immaterial. Thus one who acts upon erroneous legal advise may find himself responsible for the act of one whom he did not believe to be his partner or agent, and even though he had agreed with the other that no such relation should exist.
Agent is a Fiduciary
A fiduciary is one who acts primarily for the benefit of another. There are many types of fiduciaries and most of the business of the world is done by them. Included in the group are administrators of estates, guardians, trustees and directors of corporations, as well as agents. All of these have similar duties of loyalty to their beneficiaries and forego all personal advantage aside from compensation in the exercise of their tasks. Of course, the partner, although a fiduciary, by fulfilling the dual role of agent and principal, reaps personal advantage over and above any compensation his partners may grant him for serving as agent. However, such personal advantage accrues to him not while wearing the hat of an agent, but while wearing the hat of a principal. ..."
AGENCY and PARTNERSHIP, American Casebook Series (1962)-General Editor Erwin N. Griswold; by Warren A. Seavey (Bussey Professor of Law, Emeritus, Harvard University), Harold G. Reuschlein (Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University), Livingston Hall (Professor of Law, Harvard University); Law School Publications of West Publishing Company; CASES on AGENCY AND PARTNERSHIP; West Publishing Co.
The above extends not only in contract law, but to conspiracy as well. Conspiracies, by their very nature, do have principals and agents, and are essentially agreements and contracts among the conspirators. Therefore, this comparison is highly relevant in our investigation, and prosecution of those involved.
PRESENTS FOR VOLUME V
In Volume IV and elsewhere we have delved deeper into the 'money' aspect. We go considerably deeper into this web of deceit, fraud and conspiracy.
"Congress and the President, like the courts, possess no power not derived from the Constitution."
[Ex parte Quirin, 1942, 63 S.Ct. 2, 317 U.S. 1, 87 L.Ed. 3.]
"The government of the United States can claim no powers which are not granted to it by the Constitution, and the powers actually granted must be such as are expressly given or given by necessary implication."
[Martin v. Hunter, Va. 1816, 14 U.S. 326, 4 L.Ed. 97.]
"The United States and its governmental departments and agencies are entities of conferred, not inherent, powers, and their authority is found in objective law set up by people in Constitution, in statutes, and in judicially recognized principles."
[U.S. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., D.C.D.C 1943, 53 F.Supp. 889.]
"This Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and no Act of Congress is of any validity which does not rest on authority conferred by that instrument."
[U.S. v. Germaine, Me.1878, 99 U.S. 508, 9 Otto. 508, 25 L.Ed. 482. (USCA p 556)]
3A Am Jur 1420, Aliens and Citizens
"A person is born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, for purposes of acquiring citizenship at birth, if this birth occurs in a TERRITORY over which the United States is sovereign" [emphasis added]
CANONS OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS - AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION
Preamble. In America, where stability of Court and of all departments of government rests upon approval of the people, it is peculiarly essential that the system for establishing and dispensing Justice be developed to a high point of efficiency and so maintained that the public shall have absolute confidences in the integrity and impartiality of its administration. The future of the Republic, to a great extent, depends upon our maintenance of Justice pure and unsullied. It cannot be so maintained unless the conduct and the motives of the members of our profession are such as to merit the approval of all just men.
No code or set of rules can be framed, which will particularize all the duties of the lawyer in varying phases of litigation or in all the relations of professional life. The following canons of ethics are adopted by the American Bar Association as a general guide, yet the enumeration of particular duties should not be construed as a denial of the existence of others equally imperative, though not specifically mentioned.
THE DUTY OF THE LAWYER TO THE COURTS
It is the duty of the lawyer to maintain towards the Courts a respectful attitude, not for the sake of the temporary incumbent of the judicial office, but for the maintenance of its supreme importance. Judges, not being wholly free to defend themselves, are peculiarly entitled to receive the support of the Bar against unjust criticism and clamor. Whenever there is proper ground for serious complaint of a judicial officer, it is the right and duty of the lawyer to submit his grievances to the proper authorities. In such cases, but not otherwise, such charges should be encouraged and the person making them should be protected. ...
15. HOW FAR A LAWYER MAY GO IN SUPPORTING A CLIENT'S CASE
... But it is steadfastly to be borne in mind that the great trust of the lawyer is to be performed within not without the bounds of law. The office of attorney does not permit, much less does it demand of him for any client, violation of law or any manner or fraud or chicane. He must obey his own conscience and not that of his client.
29. UPHOLDING THE HONOR OF THE PROFESSION.
Lawyers should expose without fear or favor before the proper tribunals corrupt or dishonest conduct in the profession, and should accept without hesitation employment against a member of the Bar who has wronged his client. The counsel upon the trial of cause in which perjury has been committed owe it to the profession and to the public to bring the matter to the knowledge of the prosecuting authorities. ...He should strive at all times to uphold the honor and to maintain the dignity of the profession and to improve not only the law but the administration of justice.
32. THE LAWYERS DUTY IN ITS LAST ANALYSIS.
No client, corporate or individual, however powerful, nor any cause, civil or political, however important, is entitled to receive nor should any lawyer render any service or advise involving disloyalty to the law whose ministers we are, or disrespect of the judicial office, which we are bound to uphold, or corruption of any person or persons exercising public office or private trust, or deception or betrayal of the public. When rendering such improper service or advise, the lawyer invites stern and just condemnation. Correspondingly, he advances the honor of his profession ...when he renders service or gives advise tending to impress upon the client and his undertaking exact compliance with the strictest principles of moral law. ...But above all a lawyer will find his highest honor in deserved reputation for fidelity to private trust and to public duty, as an honest man and as a patriotic and loyal citizen.
41. DISCOVERY OF IMPOSITION AND DECEPTION.
When a lawyer discovers that some fraud or deception has been practiced, which has unjustly imposed upon the court or a party, he should endeavor to rectify it; at first by advising his client, and if his client refuses to forego the advantage thus unjustly gained, he should promptly inform the injured person or his counsel, so that they may take appropriate steps. ...
OATH OF ADMISSION.
The general principles which should ever control the lawyer in the practice of his profession are clearly set forth in the following Oath of Admission to the Bar, formulated upon that in use in the State of Washington, and which conforms in it's main outlines to the "duties" of lawyers as defined by statutory enactments in that and many other States of the Union-duties which they are sworn on admission to obey and for the willful violation of which disbarment is provided:
I DO SOLEMNLY SWEAR:
I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of ______________ .
I will maintain the respect due to Courts of Justice and judicial officers;
I will not counsel or maintain any suit or proceeding which shall appear to me to be unjust, nor any defense except such as I believe to be honestly debatable under the law of the land;
I will employ for the purpose of maintaining the causes confided to me such means only as are consistent with truth and honor, and will never seek to mislead the Judge or jury by any artifice or false statement of fact or law;
I will maintain the confidence and preserve inviolate the secrets of my client, and will accept no compensation in connection with his business except from him or with his knowledge and approval;
I will obstain from all offensive personality, and advance no fact prejudicial to the honor or reputation of a party or witness, unless required by the justice of the cause with which I am charged;
I will never reject, from any consideration personal to myself, the cause of the defenseless or oppressed, or delay any man's cause for lucre or malice. SO HELP ME GOD
We commend this form of oath for adoption by the proper authorities in all the States and Territories.
MATERIALS FOR LEGAL METHOD -Dowling, Patterson, Powell - University Casebook Series - Second Edition - The Foundation Press, Inc. (1952) excerpts from pages 225-232
The American Bar Association is the agency or association that United States Attorneys apparently are members of; the judges and magistrates as well.
Though this is an old version, take due Notice of the Oath they take.
Judicial officers take a similar Oath and are held under The Code of Judicial Conduct.
13. presumptions - More on "MONEY", IMF, WORLD BANK, FED
Fredick Bastiat:
"When a portion of wealth is transferred from the person who owns it - without his consent and without compensation, and whether by force or fraud - to anyone who does not own it, then I say that property is violated; that an act of plunder is committed. I say that this act is exactly what the law is supposed to suppress, always and everywhere."
"But how is legal plunder to be identified?
Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to the other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime."
"Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws.
On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place."
"When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing respect for the law."
"Everyone wants to live at the expense of the State. They forget that the State lives at the expense of everyone... The State is the great fictitious entity by which everyone seeks to live at the expense of everyone else."
--
"My agency in promoting the passage of the National Bank Act was the greatest financial mistake of my life. It has built up a monopoly which affects every interest in the country. It should be repealed; but before that can be accomplished, the people will be arrayed on one side and the banks on the other, in a contest such as we have never seen before in this country."
Salmon P. Chase
"Under the Federal Reserve Act panics are scientifically created; the present panic is the first scientifically created one, worked out as we figure a mathematical problem."
Hon. Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr. writing of the Panic of 1920
"The only honest dollar is a dollar of stable, debt-paying, purchasing power. The only honest dollar is a dollar which repays the creditor the value he lent and no more, and require the debtor to pay the value borrowed and no more."
Senator Robert L. Owens (okla.) 1913
Here is another document from the Internet, this one dealing with IMF, World Bank, FED, and money issues from an apparent former member of the IMF. I state here and after, that I have no way to confirm this document.
Internet Document RE: Jon May
TESTIMONY OF JONATHAN MAY
Jonathan May formerly worked for the International Monetary Fund in England. In the early 1980s he came to America with a plan to release Americans from debt to the banking system by employing the same "credit creating" system used by international banking. The law governing this system is the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). May was initially successful. Eventually, however, he was targeted and imprisoned by the banking system. He is now in a Federal prison in the Midwest. While in prison he was interviewed by Lindsey Williams via phone. The following is the text of that interview.
--
"There are thirteen families which effectively control the central Banks of the hard currency countries of the world. The hard currency countries are those whose currency is not allowed to fluctuate as much as the other countries' currency fluctuates. These thirteen families have the control of the policy-making and decision-making of the central Banks of those countries. They all practice fractional reserve banking. Fractional reserve banking has allowed the central Banks to permit the prime Banks to lend up to twenty-six units of currency for every one unit of currency they have on deposit. The owners and controllers of the prime Banks are the same people who own and control the central Banks.
The initial final stage of System 2000 was put into effect in the mid-seventies. System 2000 is the global creditors unilateral totalitarian plan for the control of the world.
A Pentagon official and three other U.S. government officials went to the Prime Minister of Nigeria. They paid him $50,000,000 to more than double the price of body light crude oil. This is the crude oil of Nigeria which is some of the most valuable crude oil in the world. At the same time that the Prime Minister of Nigeria was being persuaded, other Trilateral Commission members were in the Middle East persuading the Middle East nations and England to consolidate OPEC. The deal cut with the Middle East oil producers was that the oil buyers were prepared to pay significantly higher prices for oil if the Middle East nations would invest the revenues in the big Banks in America.
Sheik Yamani's nephew assured us that Sheik Yamani and other oil ministers did not know until late in the seventies or in the eighties that the controlling interest of the prime Banks is held by the same people who have the controlling interest in the major oil companies. They control through a joint stock trust which was set up by the original Rockefellers here in America in 1870. This was three years before the United States government declared joint stock trusts illegal in 1873. It is this entity which is the ultimate controlling factor in America of the prime Banks, the Federal Reserve, the major oil companies, and many other multi-nationals. This trust is in joint control of the Rockefeller Foundation and their European interest.
The deal cut with the Saudis, the Kuwaitis, and the middle eastern peoples was that they were to put their money in the prime Banks in America. They did not know that the prime Banks were able to lend twenty to one. All they were to receive was the interest on the money they deposited for between ten to thirty years. They were to receive the principal at the end of the term.
Because they had locked-in deposits from the Middle Eastern nations, the Banks were able to make loans to the Third World nations. The Banks relied on the greed of those ministers of those Third World nations to mishandle the money. Over the years, that manipulated greed has caused those countries to be in the bankrupt position they are in today.
In 1981, I found out that the Hunt brothers of Texas and John Conley, the Governor of Texas, who was also the Under Secretary of the Treasury, had secretly tried to implement a new currency for Texas. They could legally do this because Texas is only a part of the United States by treaty. This treaty is automatically renewed every year. It has become a tradition, obviously, that it is renewed every year because it is not actually, physically, renewed every year.
This made it possible for Texas to create its own money.
The Hunts were in partnership with the Shah of Iran, a German bank, and an Austrian bank. The Hunts made one mistake. They were buying and selling silver irresponsibly. They had one man doing both buying and selling on the same floors in all the exchanges. Word got out and the result was that the German banker was murdered, the Austrian banker was so badly beaten that he will never get out of a mental institution, and the Hunts are virtually bankrupt today. The Hunts had sixteen billions in worth at the time. The Shah was perfectly healthy when he left Iran. He was only declared sick when he arrived in America. He was held in "protective custody" in military bases where he was treated and became progressively worse and ultimately was shipped off to die.
In 1983, we became aware of the fact that a group of very, very quiet bank holding companies were extending credit wherever they felt like it, under whatever terms they felt like. They are authorized under Regulation Y, Section 225.4 of the United States Code to extend this credit. Those companies were receiving loans from the prime Banks. With this money they were buying foreclosed real property and businesses with bricks and mortar from liquidations, foreclosures and bankruptcies. These were businesses which were affected by FDIC and FSLIC foreclosures. We could not understand this, and between 1983 and 1985 we researched it and still could not understand it.
Then we found the answer in 1985 when we were approached by an emissary from President Marcos of the Philippines and President Saharte and others from Indonesia. They had a severe problem. Their problem was that, having borrowed all the money that they had borrowed, they now needed more money. The only way that the International Monetary Fund was prepared to lend them more money was if they would do three things:
Eliminate their own currencies and become Dollar denominated. This would eliminate cash altogether.
If they would go to a unilateral centralized credit card system. This was to be a part of their Social Security system, part of their identity system whereby everybody in the country would have a Social Security number which would be synonymous with a credit card number. Their Central Bank was to act as the wholesaler for credit which was extended to it by the new super bank. This was announced by Paul Volker on the 27th of October, 1985.
In order to help the economies of those countries, the International Monetary Fund was going to nominate external non-domestic corporations to properly engineer, exploit and excavate the minerals from those countries in return for PERPETUAL ROYALTIES. This excavation would bring prosperity to the nation. Marcos was sharp enough to pick up on the word PERPETUAL, and realized he would be signing away the sovereignty of his nation. He was not prepared to do this. Marcos approached us through his emissary, Colonel Christopher Banis. We were aware of this offer made by the International Monetary Fund through our connections in London who are close to Sir Jeffrey Howe. If they agreed to the International Monetary Fund's terms and conditions, they were to have their existing debts forgiven, absolutely. New lines of credit were to be extended to them and the new lines of credit were to be under better terms and conditions.
When we heard the term PERPETUAL, and when we heard the words "Totally forgiven", we immediately began to recognize what was happening.
Another group of holding companies was operating with the previous group of holding companies. The second group of holding companies was receiving credit from the first group to purchase assets and liabilities from the prime Banks. The only liabilities they were purchasing were the liabilities represented by the deposits of the Arab nations. The only assets they were buying were the assets represented by the loans made to some of the debtor nations.
It then became clear, through our own people in the Trilateral Commission, that the forgiveness of the Third World debts would eliminate the assets which were being purchased by this second group of holding companies. This left them only with the liabilities that were owed to the Middle East nations and being serviced by the prime Banks.
The Arab nations had no idea that these liabilities were now owed by the holding companies and that the debtor nations had stopped paying the prime Banks. The prime Banks' and holding companies' arrangements were that the prime Banks were to act as servicing agents for the holding companies so that the Third World nations would not know that the holding companies were owed the money.
The effect of the elimination of the assets of the second group of holding companies is threefold:
The holding companies would be insolvent and would legally be able to declare themselves insolvent.
They could legally and legitimately avoid payment to the Middle Eastern Nations.
The Middle Eastern Arab nations will have to liquidate all their other assets. These assets are represented by U.S. corporate ownership and many billions of dollars worth of U.S. stock. The effect of the Saudis and Kuwaitis and the Middle Eastern people's sale of even 25% of their total holdings on the U.S. market would be absolutely chaotic in terms of the stock market, real estate and everything else.
The catastrophic effect has been designed to throw the American stock market, the American corporations, the American real estate, and people in general into a state of confusion. The plan is that this state of confusion will be greeted with the salvation of the benevolent bankers on three fronts:
They propose to eliminate cash because of the collapse.
Stop drug trafficking because the drug traffickers would now have no money to use.
Stop tax cheating. NOBODY CAN ARGUE WITH ANY OF THESE REASONS.
It is at this point that they intend to implement a mandatory credit card identity Social Security government. There will be an I.D. card which will be satellite linked through the "Star Wars program". [MY NOTE: ON STAR (satellite auto identification and disable control), satellite traceable 'smart credit cards', satellite tracked cell phones, and the injectable 'identity' devices for humans and animals now in use as technology increases their ability to 'track'. Now a private 'corporate' venture, previously referred to under Star Wars_ my note]
Only 40% of "Star Wars" has anything to do with defense. 60% is designed for transmission of banking information instantaneously to the central banks which will be the super Banks into which all the major Banks of the world will be linked. The super bank is to be the wholesaler and the prime Banks are to be the retailers in the foreign countries that have capitulated to the International Monetary Fund's program.
It only takes 5% of the total debtor nations to equal all of the deposits of the Saudis that are in the Banks. The reason for this is the twenty-to-one ratio of fractional reserve banking. It works in contrary reverse. It doesn't take many nations to agree to the International Monetary Fund's proposal for the total volume of money owed to equal the total volume of money on deposit from the Saudis. Twenty debtor nations have already agreed to the International Monetary Fund's proposal.
The resultant collapse of the second group of holding companies will precipitate the Saudis' and Kuwaitis' liquidation of assets.
When the second group of holding companies are unable to pay the private group of bank holding companies the money they owe them from the credit extended to them to buy the assets and liabilities, it will precipitate those bank holding companies inability to pay the loans extended to them by the prime Banks to buy the foreclosed land which was used as collateral to secure those loans. Ultimately, the prime Banks will end up with all the properties. President Garcia of Peru announced in February of this year that they were absolutely not going to pay the International Monetary Fund. Rockefeller himself went to Peru in February of 1986. Rockefeller personally made the offer to Garcia of the three-point proposal which was mentioned earlier. Garcia told David that if he wasn't out of the country in twenty-four hours that he would have him arrested for racketeering.
You will see the foreclosures on real property in America stepped up drastically by the FDIC and FSLIC. They are using gangsteristic tactics to achieve their objective for their masters.
Since the advent of the manipulation of the oil producing countries to sell all their oil in U.S. dollars, the entire world trade is now denominated in U.S. dollars because of the volatility of all the other currencies. The entire trading volume of the world will be totally and absolutely beholden to the super Banks. When System 2000 is put into effect, the super Banks will be the only source of "U.S. Dollars" credit. There will be no cash."
---- END
The above document is one which I could not, obviously, personally verify. When we read the above, instantly the 'imprisonment' issue brings question of the viability to our minds, (he 'must have been found guilty by a jury, right), whether warranted or not.
Yet it does explain certain occurrences in this world.
Obviously we can now see why United States was built up by these financiers. They needed something for the rest of the world to 'want', this supposed 'wealth'; which we, as Americans, supposedly enjoy.
Yet we should also note, that they can and do manipulate this economy whenever it suits their purpose. And they have attempted to institute our 'bankruptcy' money as the worlds "standard measure". One small step towards its debasement-devaluation, and they reap massive amounts of lands, businesses, resources, and, quite literally, nations. This nation would be worthless if the financiers ever pulled their support of federal reserve notes.
"Every effort has been made by the Federal Reserve Board (FED) to conceal its powers, but the truth is - the FED has usurped the government. It controls everything here (in Congress) and it controls all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will."
- Cong. Louis T. McFadden (1933)
"Goverment is the only agency that can take a useful commodity like paper, slap some ink in it, and make it totally worthless."
Ludwig von Mises
If one considers the above present with the below, we open up, what the government would label, a new 'conspiracy theory' for the JFK assassination, but this might be, in part, the actual reason.
---
If one reviews President Kennedy shortly before his assassination, we see he was preparing to tell Americans and the world something which would we would have difficulty accepting.
Perhaps the above and below was the precursor. (parts of the below are excerpts from John B. Nelson Document dated: 26 of December, 1991- BBS Document without quotation Marks)
----
On June 4, 1963, President Kennedy issued Executive Order 11110 to print real United States dollars with no debt or credit, or interest attached. He bypassed the IDA, FED, IMF, and the World Bank, and upon his death, the printing ceased and the currency was withdrawn from circulation. The 1963 Kennedy dollar was a real U.S. Note, 'substance money'. It said "United States Note" - not "Federal Reserve Note". Just as our real 'substance' 'government backed' currency previously indicated before our bankruptcy. Though that was under 'Gold Certificate' or 'Silver Certificate' redeemable for equal value in such.
"The high office of the President, had been used to foment a plot to destroy the American's freedom, and before I leave office I must inform the citizen of his plight."
- John F. Kennedy at Columbia Univ. 10 days before his assassination on November 22,1963.
Taken with the above, Senate Report 93-549, and this Expose`, we see there is a very real plot to destroy American freedom. Remember, The Warren Report was created without all branches of government reporting. They even registered complaint of such.
In creating this real United States Note, Kennedy placed himself as a very real threat to the financial conglomerate. We see that it was withdrawn shortly after his assassination.
A few short years later, we see his replacement signing the Coinage Act on July 23, 1965, in which Lyndon B. Johnson states in his Press Release:
"When I have signed this bill before me, we will have made the first fundamental change in our coinage in 173 years. The Coinage Act of 1965 supersedes the Act of 1792. And that Act had the title: An Act Establishing a Mint and Regulating the Coinage of the United States ...Now I will sign this bill to make the first change in our coinage system since the 18th Century. To those members of Congress, who are here on this historic occasion, I want to assure you that in making this change from the 18th Century, we have no idea of returning to it."
What was this change?
The last fine silver coins were issued in 1964.
We now use 'wafer alloyed' [discounted] coinage. So our coins are no longer real valued "money" either. Therefore, we no longer have any part of our "gold or silver coin as Tender in payment of debt" of the Constitutional contract [Art. 1 Sec. 10] left in America. Every form of money now used in America is called 'fiat money', which has no value beyond what the backer 'claims' it has.
Why was this silver removed?
Because even this relatively small amount of silver had to be used as payment to the FED, we could no longer 'afford' to use it in our coins.
By 1967 United States removed all bimetallism (use of gold or silver backing) from Americas 'currency' and in 1970 sold all of its silver reserve.
It was not until 1975 that Americans were allowed to own, buy and sell gold as a commodity, but gold coins cannot circulate as money.
In 1982, the U. S. mint began to produce gold (first since 1933) and silver 'commemorative' coins for collectors and investors, not for general use or circulation. 1986 marked the first 'bullion' coins for collectors and investors.
We now come present day [03-2004] and see Allen Greenspan [FED agent] advising Congress, that unless the debt is reduced, and spending is curtailed, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and the like will not be viable for the people.
Why would he tell congress this?
Why would they care?
Because America has little left to put 'upfront' for credit; we are and have been in 'bankruptcy' for decades (at least since the 1920s) and are a 'poor risk', and:
- The corporations are leaving,
-
- partially to seek cheaper labor, and increase stock value;
- partially to free themselves from the attacks they know will occur in America due to its foreign invasions and policies;
- partially because they are being used to even the 'living standard' level of other nations (see 5. below);
- partially because this nations waters and airs are now too polluted, hence cause too many diseases, hence higher health care costs, higher production costs, and the like;
- partially to avoid air, water, and soil environmental requirements;
- and partially to bring 'credit' and 'debt' to foreign nations that have not previously fully 'come on board' the credit scheme, such as China.
- The former 'third world' nations now are the major producers of the worlds goods, at a much more 'economical' cost.
- Moreover, most:
-
- are extremely willing to ask for "extended credit";
- have already instituted national health care, which means their 'budgeting' will not massively grow as the peoples age (if they budget for it now, they will be able to allow for it in the future) and the people will therefore remain relatively docile [less social and economic fluctuations].
- The United Nations has achieved its goal, nations now "request" UN forces to help them settle their 'problems'. United States is the "bad cop" to their "good cop". Moreover, we will be the one seen as the "invader" to their "savior" status. Makes one wonder about the intellect/thinking ability of our government officials. Apparently they are willing to place the people of this nation and this nation as bait - targets.
- They are also leaving to comply with WTO requirements, see Volume I, VI, and VIII Expose` to develop 'less developed nations' [Note pages 57 and 58 Volume I.
Whereas, when the FED>WORLD BANK>IMF>IDA>AID offered this credit (reorganization funds) to our government; our government chose to use it to build a massive military, roads, and extensive government agencies, rather than taking care of its people.
The world financiers know (having observed the world from the onset of civilization) when the people are not cared for, eventually they revolt or change their government. Which makes America an even more unmerited place to give credit, particularly when they already 'own' (directly or indirectly) everything in this nation, anyway.
Reviewing some historical facts we find:
(below contains non-noted excerpts from Internet documents and research, and previous presents)
The 1937 Edition of the Book of the States openly declared that the people engaged in such activities as the Farming/Husbandry Industry had been reduced to mere feudal "Tenants" on their Land. Book of The States, 1937, pg. 155.
This, of course, was compounded by such activities as price fixing wheat and grains [7 U.S.C.A. 1332], quota regulations [7 U.S.C.A. 1371], and livestock products [7 U.S.C.A 1903], which have been consistently below the costs of production, interest on loans and inflation of the paper "Bills of Credit", thereby, leaving the food producers and others in a state of peonage and involuntary servitude, constituting the taking of private property, for the benefit and use of others, without just compensation. [In recent years we see 'corporations' taking over farms and massive amounts of farm lands.]
The United States thereafter entered the second World War, during which time the "League of Nations" was re-instituted under pretense of the "United Nations" and the "Bretton Woods Agreement." (See: 60 Stat. 1401).
United States, as a corporate body politic (artificial entity), came out of World War II in worse economic shape than when it entered, and in 1950, again, declared Bankruptcy and "Reorganization."
The Reorganization evidence is located in Title 5 of the United States Codes Annotated. The "Explanation" at the beginning of 5 U.S.C.A. is most informative reading.
The "Secretary of Treasury" was appointed as the "Receiver" in Bankruptcy. (See: Reorganization Plan No. 26; 5 U.S.C.A. 903; Public Law 94-564; Legislative History, pg. 5967)
United States continued down this road, and periodically filed for further 'Reorganization'.
Situations worsened, having done what they were Commanded NOT to do, (See: Madison's Notes, Constitutional Convention, August 16, 1787, Federalist Papers No. 44) and in 1965 passed the "Coinage Act of 1965" completely debasing the Constitutional Coin (gold and silver i.e. Dollar). (See 18 U.S.C.A. 331 & 332; U.S. vs. Marigold, 50 U.S. 560, 13 L.Ed. 257)
It is important, again, to take cognizance of the fact that NO Constitutional Amendment was ever obtained to FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE, amend, abridge or abolish the Constitutional mandates, provisions or prohibitions. However, due to internal and external diversions surrounding the Vietnam War, the usurpation and breach went basically unchallenged and unnoticed by the general public at large, who became "a wealthy man's cannon folder or cheap source of slave labor." (See: Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars, TM-SW7905.1, pgs. 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, & 56).
Congress was clearly delegated the Power and Authority to regulate and maintain the true and inherent "value" of the Coin within the scope and purview of Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl.s 5 & 6 and Art. I, Sec. 10, Cl. 1, of the ordained Constitution of The United States of America (1781), and further, under a corresponding duty and obligation to maintain said gold and silver Coin and Foreign Coin at and within the necessary and proper "equal weights and measures" clause. (See also: Public Law 97-289; 96 Stat. 1211)
Those exercising the Offices of the several States, in equal measure, knew such "De Facto Transitions" were unlawful, unconstitutional, and unauthorized. Notwithstanding such, sanctioned, implemented and enforced the complete debauchment and the resulting "governmental, social, industrial economic change" in the "De Jure" States and in United States of America (See: Public Law 94-564; Legislative History, pg. 5936, 5945; 31 U.S.C.A. 314; 31 U.S.C.A. 321; 31 U.S.C.A. 5112; C.R.S. 11-61-101; C.R.S. 39-22-103.5 and C.R.S. 18-11-203).
They were and continue to do both directly and indirectly what they were absolutely prohibited from doing. (See also, Federalist Papers No. 44; Craig vs. Missouri, 4 Peters 903)
Our problem?
Apparently there are no courts available to correct this unlawful activity in, nor will the congresses, or presidents, or state "officials" or courts.
In 1966, Congress being severely compromised, passed the "Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966", by which the entire taxing and monetary system i.e. "Essential Engine" (See: Federalist Papers No. 31) was placed under the Uniform Commercial Code. (See: Public Law 89-719, Legislative History, pg. 3722, also see, C.R.S. 5-1- 106).
The Uniform Commercial Code was, as previously identified in other Volumes, promulgated by the National Conference of Commissioners On Uniform State Laws in collusion with the American Law Institute for the "banking and business interests." (See: Handbook Of The National Conference of Commissioners On Uniform State Laws, (1966) Ed. pgs. 152 & 153). [Remember these parties are working for world uniformity, so who are they actually working for; not us, obviously.]
United States, became engaged in numerous U.N.- IMF conflicts, including the Korean and the Vietnam conflicts, which were under direction of the United Nations (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 287d); agreeing to foot the bill (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 287j), and not being able to honor the obligations and re-hypothecated debt credit, openly and publicly dishonored and disavowed their "Notes" and "obligations" (12 U.S.C.A. 411) i.e. "Federal Reserve Notes" through Public Law 90-269, Section 2, 82 Stat. 50 (1968) to wit:
"Sec. 2. The first sentence of section 15 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 391) is amended by striking 'and the funds provided in this Act for the redemption of Federal Reserve Notes'."
Things steadily grew worse and on March 28, 1970, President Nixon issued Proclamation No. 3972, declaring an "emergency" because the Postal Employees struck against the de facto government for higher pay, due to inflation of the paper "Bills of Credit." (See: Senate Report No. 93-549, pg. 596)
Nixon, thereafter, placed the U.S. Postal Department under the control of the "Department of Defense." (See: Department Of The Army Field Manual, FM 41-10 (1969))
"The System had been faltering for a decade, but the bench mark date of the collapse is put at August 15, 1971. On this day, President Nixon reversed U.S. international monetary policy by officially declaring the non-convertibility of the U.S. dollar [F.R.N.] into gold." (See: Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5937 & Senate Report No. 93-549, Foreword, pg. III; Proclamation No. 4074, pg. 597, 31 U.S.C.A. 314 & 31 U.S.C.A. 5112).
On September 21, 1973, Congress passed Public Law 93-110, amending the Bretton Woods Par Value Modification Act, 86 Stat. 116, 31 U.S.C.A. 449, and reiterated the "Emergency", 12 U.S.C.A. 95a, and section 8 of the Bretton Woods Agreements Act of 1945 (22 U.S.C.A. 286f); which included "reports on foreign currency transactions." (Also note, Executive Order No. 10033)
This act further declared in Section 2 (b) that:
"No provision of any law in effect on the date of enactment of this Act, and no rule, regulation, or order under authority of any such law, may be construed to prohibit any person from purchasing, holding, selling or otherwise dealing with gold."
Which we could now do, because we were never going back to any form of 'substance currency' (bimetellism), everything from then on was to be based on 'thin air'. Meaning our 'currency' is totally worthless, only forced at value on the world market by the FED>WORLD BANK>IMF and the hidden financiers/world controllers - STATE and its fiat money.
On January 19, 1976, Margorie S. Holt noted for the record, a second "Declaration of INTERdependence" and clearly identified the U.N. as a "Communist" organization, and that they were seeking both production and monetary control over the Union and People through International Organization promoting the "One World Order." (8 U.S.C.A. 1101(40) also see, 50 U.S.C.A. 781 & 783)
The socio/economic situation worsened as noted in the complaint/Petition, filed in the U.S. Court of Claims, Docket No. 41- 76 on February 11, 1976, by 44 Federal Judges, Atkins et al. vs. U.S.
Atkins complained that:
"As a result of inflation, the compensation of federal judges has been substantially diminished each year since 1969, causing direct and continuing monetary harm to plaintiffs...the real value of the dollar decreased by approximately 34.5 percent from March 15, 1969 to October 1, 1975.
...As a result, plaintiffs have suffered an unconstitutional deprivation of earnings",
and in the prayer for relief claimed:
"damages for the constitutional violations enumerated above, measured as the diminution of his earnings for the entire period since March 15, 1969."
It is quite apparent that the persons holding and enjoying Offices of Public Trust, Honor and/or Profit knew of the emergency emergent problem and sought protection for themselves; to the damage, harm, and injury of the People and Children, who were classified as:
"a club that has many other members" (either us or them)
who:
"have no remedy."
And knowing that "heinous" acts had been committed, stated that they (judges/lawyers) would not apply the Law, nor would any substantive remedy be applied (checked more or less, but never stopped):
"until all of us (judges) are dead."
--
I am not pleased with this case. For these individuals holding 'Office(s)' of public 'Trust' and 'Profit' to even remotely indicate they have no intention of supplying: their duties and responsibilities; or, the ethics of their profession; or, to supply Law and Justice, is an extremely questionable activity, or intention. However:
Atkins et al. vs. U.S. could be interpreted in various ways.
One could be: inasmuch as they are United States subject class citizens [per Art. 2 Sec. 4; Art. VI cl.3; 14th Amend. and elsewhere] and holding Office only under our (the People's) Grant, thereby unable to 'question' the debt and or diminishment of their compensation [no standing to bring action in (any other) court]:
They were hoping one of the People, a state Citizen or national Citizen of The United States of America, would bring action concerning such debt and diminishment of their compensation. Or,
we would otherwise question the diminishment of their compensation and thereby the debt, so it could be lawfully handled.
Whereas, we have just placed this question and or action regarding the diminishment and debt and other activities set forth in these Volumes.
Neither Congress nor any other part of government has been authorized to interfere with, or otherwise restrict or restrain: my questioning these issues and others; or any style, or form of action, or case the People might address. Or,
3. Such individuals were merely concerned with themselves, and falsely swore an adhesive Oath [perjury and treasonable activity] to uphold, defend and preserve the sovereignty of the Nation and several Republican States of the Union. Which would deliberately breach the constitutional contract, and sworn Duty and Oaths to protect the People/Citizens and their Posterity from fraud, imposition, avarice and stealthy encroachment, thereby be cause for Impeachment and other prosecution.
(See: Atkins et al. vs. U.S., 556 F.2d 1028, pg. 1072, 1074; The Tempting Of America, supra, pgs. 155 - 159, also see, 5 U.S.C.A. 5305 & 5335, Senate Report No. 93-549, pgs. 69 - 71, C.R.S. 24-75-101)
---
This is verified in Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5944, which states:
"Moving to a floating exchange rate for international commerce means private enterprise and not central governments bear the risk of currency fluctuations."
Throwing out the responsibility of congress "to pay the debts"[Cl. 1]; "To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures;"[Cl. 5] and "To regulate commerce with foreign nations"[Cl. 3] at Article I Sec. 8 of the national constitutional contract.
Numerous debates were held in Congress, including but not limited to, Tuesday, Judy 27, 1976 (See: Congressional Record - House, July 27, 1976), concerning the International Financial Institutions and its operations.
Representative, Ron Paul, Chairman of the House Banking Committee, made numerous references to the true practices of the "International" financial institutions. Including, but not limited to, the conversion of 27,000,000 (27 million) in gold, contributed by the United States as part of its "quota obligations".
Which the International Monetary Fund [IMF](Governor-Secretary of Treasury) sold (See: Public Law 95-564, Legislative History, pg. 5945 & 5946), under some very questionable terms and concessions. (Also see: The Ron Paul Money Book, (1991), by Ron Paul, Plantation Publishing, 837 W. Plantation, Clute, Texas 77531; and United States Government Manual 1990/91, pgs. 480-481).
The Act further declared that:
"(2) Section 10(a) of the Gold Reserve Act of 1934 (31 U.S.C. 822a(b) is amended by striking out the phrase 'stabilizing the exchange value of the dollar'..." (c) The joint resolution entitled 'Joint resolution to assure uniform value to the coins and currencies of the United States', approved June 5, 1933 (31 U.S.C. 463) shall not apply to obligations issued on or after the date of enactment of this section."
United States, as Corporator, (22 U.S.C.A. 286E, et seq.) and "State" (C.R.S. 24-36-104; C.R.S. 24-60-1301(h)) had declared "Insolvency."
(See: 26 I.R.C. 165(g)(1); U.C.C. 1-201(23); C.R.S. 39-22--103.5; Westfall vs. Braley, 10 Ohio 188, 75 Am. Dec. 509, Adams vs. Richardson, 337 S.W. 2d 911; Ward vs. Smith, 7 Wall. 447)
A permanent state of "Emergency" was instituted, formed and erected within the Union through the contrivance, fraud and avarice of the International Financial Institutions, Organizations, Corporations and Associations, including the Federal Reserve, their "fiscal and depository agent". [22 U.S.C.A. 286d] This had led to such "Emergency" legislation as the "Public Debt Limit-Balance Budget And Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, Public Law 99- 177, etc.
The government by becoming a corporator, (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 286e) laid down its sovereignty and took on that of a private citizen. It can exercise no power which is not derived from the corporate charter. (See: The Bank of the United States vs. Planters Bank of Georgia, 6 L. Ed. (9 Wheat) 244; U.S. vs. Burr, 309 U.S. 242) The real party in interest is not the de jure "United States of America" or "State", but "The Bank" and "The Fund." (22 U.S.C.A. 286, et seq., C.R.S. 11-60-103)
The acts committed under fraud, force and seizures are many times done under "Letters of Marque and Reprisal" i.e. "recapture." (See: 31 U.S.C.A. 5323)
Such principles as "Fraud and Justice never dwell together" Wingate's Maxims 680, and "A right of action cannot arise out of fraud." Broom's maxims 297, 729; Cowper's Reports 343; 5 Scott's New Reports 558; 10 Mass. 276; 38 Fed. 800, are too high a thought concept; as is "Due Process", "Just Compensation" and Justice itself, for the governments and courts of America.
Honor is earned by honesty and integrity; not under false and fraudulent pretenses; nor will the color of the cloth one wears cover-up the usurpations, lies, trickery and deceits, and apparent treason.
When Black is fraudulently declared to be White, not all will live in darkness.
As astutely observed by Will Rogers,
"there are men running governments who shouldn't be allowed to play with matches",
which is as applicable today as ever.
The contrived "emergency" has created numerous abuses and usurpations, and abridgements of delegated Powers and Authority.
Per Senate Report 93-549:
"These proclamations give force to 470 provisions of Federal law. These hundreds of statutes delegate to the President extraordinary powers, ordinarily exercised by the Congress, which affect the lives of American citizens in a host of all-encompassing manners. This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough authority to rule the country without reference to normal constitutional process.
Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may:
seize property;
organize and control the means of production;
seize commodities;
assign military forces abroad;
institute martial law;
seize and control all transportation and communication;
regulate the operation of private enterprise;
restrict travel;
and in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens."
(See: Foreword, pg. III - SEE: Expose` Volume I - Additional Materials section for 'Best Copy' {'best copy' means out of print, but certified as best evidence for legal use} version)(format of above changed)
The "Introduction", on page 1, begins with a phenomenal declaration, which can not be understated, to wit:
"A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have in varying degrees been abridged by laws brought into force by statues of national emergency."
That, of course, was stated in 1973, we have now had no lawful government, no constitutional courts, or a congress which respects the law, constitutions or anything else, for over seventy (70) years.
According to the research done in 16 American jurisprudence, 2nd Edition, Sections 71 and 82, no "emergency" justifies a violation of any Constitutional provision. Arguendo, "Supremacy Clause" and "Separation of Powers", yet it is clearly admitted in Senate Report No. 93-549 that abridgment and defilement has occurred.
The statements heard in the Federal and State Tribunals, on numerous occasions; that Constitutional arguments are "immaterial", "frivolous" etc., are based upon concealment, furtherance and compounding of the frauds and "Emergency" created and sustained by the "Expatriated", ALIENS of the United Nations and its Organizations, Corporations and Associations. (See: Letter, Insight Magazine, February 18, 1991, pg. 7, Lowell L. Flanders, President, U.N. Staff Union, New York)
8 U.S.C.A. 1481 is one of the controlling statutes on expatriation, as are 22 U.S.C.A. 611 - 613 and 50 U.S.C.A. 781.
The foreign agency-Internal Revenue Service entered into a "service agreement" with the U.S. Treasury Department (See: Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5987, Reorganization Plan No. 26) and the Agency for International Development, pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 91.
The Agency For International Development [AID] is an International paramilitary operation (See: Department Of The Army Field Manual, (1969) FM 41-10, pgs. 1-4, Sec. 1-7(b) & 1-6, Section 1- -10(7)(c)(1); 22 U.S.C.A. 284). Which includes such activities as "Assumption of full or partial executive, legislative, and judicial authority over a country or area." (See: FM 41-10, pg. 1-7, Section 110(7)(c)(4))
See also, Agreement Between The United Nations And The United States Of America Regarding The Headquarters Of The United Nations, Section 7(d) & (8), 22 U.S.C.A. 287 (1979 Ed.) at pg. 241).
Be it further Noticed, that the "Agreement" regarding the Headquarters District of the United Nations was NOT agreed to (See: Congressional Record - Senate, December 13, 1967, Mr. Thurmond), and is illegally in the Country in the first instance.
The International Organizational intents, purposes and activities include complete control of "Public Finance" i.e. "control, supervision, and audit of indigenous fiscal resources; budget practices, taxation, expenditures of public funds, currency issues, and banking agencies and affiliates." (See: FM 41-10, pgs. 2-30 thru 2-31, Section 251. /Public Finance).
This of course complies with "Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars", Research Technical Manual TM-SW7905.1, which discloses:
a 'declaration of war upon the American people' (See: pg. 3 & 7);
monetary control by the Internationalist, through information etc. solicited and collected by the Internal Revenue Service (See TM-SW7905.1, pg. 48,
also see, 22 U.S.C.A. 286f & Executive Order No. 10033, 26 U.S.C.A. 6103(k)(4)) and which is operating and enforcing the seditious International program. (See: TM-SW7905.1, pg. 52).
The 1985 Edition of the Department Of Army Field Manual, FM 41-10 further describes the International "Civil Affairs" operations. At page 3-6 it is admitted that the A.I.D. is autonomous and under direction of the International Development Cooperation Agency, and at page 3-8, that the operation is "paramilitary." The International Organization(s) intents and purposes was to promote, implement and enforce a "DICTATORSHIP OVER FINANCE IN THE UNITED STATES." (See: Senate Report No. 93-549, pg. 186)
It appears from the documentary evidence that the Internal Revenue Service Agents etc., are "Agents of a Foreign Principal" within the meaning and intent of the "Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938."
They are directed and controlled by the corporate "Governor" of The Fund" a/k/a "Secretary of Treasury" (See: Public Law 94-564, supra, pg. 5942, U.S. Government Manual 1990/91, pgs. 480 & 481, 26 U.S.C.A. 7701(a)(11), Treasury Delegation Order No. 150-10), and the corporate "Governor" of "The Bank" 22 U.S.C.A. 286 & 286a.
Additionally, acting as "information-service employees 22 U.S.C.A. 611(c)(ii), and have been and do now "solicit, collect, disburse or dispense contribution (Tax - pecuniary contribution, Black's Law Dict. 5th ed.), loans, money or other things of value for or in interest of such foreign principal 22 U.S.C.A. 611(c)(iii), and they entered into agreements with a Foreign Principal pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 91 i.e. the "Agency For International Development."[A.I.D.] (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 611(c)(2))
Take special Notice that the Internal Revenue Service is also an agency of the International Criminal Police Organization [ICPO], and solicits, collects, and distributes information on all Americans and their properties, assets, etceteras, and any entity or person which has 'business' with America, for 150 foreign powers (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 263a, The United States Government Manual, 1990/91, pg. 385, see also, The Ron Paul Money Book, pg. 250 - 251)
Yet we are presently being mis-directed to 'outsourcing' of 'jobs' as the major problem with dissemination of our private information across the world.
Notice well, that Congress has appropriated, transferred, and converted vast sums to Foreign Powers (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 262c(b), and has entered into numerous Foreign Taxing Treaties (conventions) (See: 22 U.S.C.A 285g, 22 U.S.C.A. 287j) and other Agreements, which are solicited and collected pursuant to 26 I.R.C. 6103(k)(4).
Along with the other presents of these Volumes, this should absolve any further doubt as to the true character of the controlling parties involved in this international conspiracy of world control and subjugation.
Such restrictions as "For the general welfare and common defense of the United States" (See: Constitution (1787), Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 1) apparently are not applicable, and the fraudulent re-hypothecated debt credit will be merely added to the insolvent nature of the continual "emergency", and the reciprocal socio/economic repercussions laid upon present and future generations.
Hence, we find President Bush and congress (2004) spending without concern, while reducing most spending or bankrupting future spending for the programs for the people; 'privatizing' for drug companies, health care providers, and other STATE sponsored 'businesses', and decreasing 'taxes' for the wealthiest of America. Thereby, placing even more of this massive debt upon the actual 'working' class.
Though the CEOs, 'white collar workers', government 'employees', 'money managers', 'stock brokers', judges, attorneys, and others claim they 'work' hard for their 'money' and compensations, and are doing so for us; they are, in actuality, just conspiring to place us deeper into debt; and other countries people in the same position.
Among other reasons for lack of authority to act in this fashion, such as the required Foreign Agents Registration Statement, 22 U.S.C.A. 612 and 18 U.S.C.A. 219 & 951, military authority cannot be imposed into civil affairs. (See: Department Of The Army Pamphlet 27100- 70, Military Law Review, Vol. 70)
The United Nations Charter, Article 2, Section 7, further prohibits the U.N. from "intervening in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state..."
Hence, Korea, Vietnam, Ethiopia, Angola, Kuwait, Iraq, Iran, etceteras, are evidence enough of the "BAD FAITH" of the United Nations and its Organizations, Corporations and Associations, and regretfully, our nation as well.
Such is the "Rule of Law" "as envisioned by the Founders" of the United Nations. Such is STATE terrorism, despotism and tyranny.
All are outlawed in The United States of America, strictly forbidden by the nation's constitution and the state constitutions.
President Bush's public address of September 11, 1991 [Bush, the 1st] (See: Weekly Compilation Of Presidential Documents), should further qualify what has been presented here. He admitted "Interdependence" (See: Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5950), "One World Order" (See also: Extension Of Remarks, January 19, 1976, Marjorie S. Holt, 8 U.S.C.A. 1101(40)), affiliation and collusion with the Soviet Union Oligarchy (50 U.S.C.A. 781), direction by the U.N., 22 U.S.C.A. 611, etc.
Take due notice that Treasury Delegation Order No. 92 states that the I.R.S. is trained under direction of the Division of "Human Resources" (United Nations) and the (INTERNATIONAL) Commissioner, by the "Office of Personnel Management", United Nations.
In the 1979 Edition of 22 U.S.C.A. 287, The United Nations, at pg. 248, you will find Executive Order No. 10422. The Office Of Personnel Management is under direction of the Secretary General of the United Nations. Moreover, as Stated previously, the I.R.S. is also a member in a one hundred fifty (150) nation pact called the "International Criminal Police Organization" [ICPO], found at 22 U.S.C.A. 263a.
The "Memorandum & Agreement" between the Secretary of Treasury/Corporate Governor of "The Fund" [IMF] and "The Bank" [World Bank] and the Office of the U.S. Attorney General and his associates are soliciting and collecting information for Foreign Principals. (See, The United States Government Manual 1990/91, pg. 385, also see, The Ron Paul Money Book, supra, pg. 250, 251)
MARK THE ABOVE WELL:
Our United States Attorney General is working directly for foreign governments and corporations.
Take due notice, that an Attorney/Representative is required to file a "Foreign Agents Registration Statement" pursuant to 22 U.S.C.A. 611(c)(1)(iv) & 612), if representing the interests of a Foreign Principal or Power. (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 613, Rabinowitz vs. Kennedy, 376 U.S. 605, 11 L. Ed. 2d 940, 18 U.S.C.A. 219 & 951)
--
Therefore, as we have addressed in these Volumes, our courts, and governments are knowingly, willingly, and with fully knowledge of the criminal nature of their activities, furthering destruction of this nation from within, on behalf of foreign entities.
Now we must address why all these things, established in these Volumes, have been furthered. Moreover, why these constitute treasonous acts.
Edmund Burke - 18th Century historian
"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle"
"The great difference between the real statesman and the pretender is, that the one sees into the future, while the other regards only the present; the one lives by the day, and acts on expediency; the other acts on enduring principles and for immortality. "
"A Nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidiable, for he is known and he carriers his banners openly. But the traitor moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the galleys, heard in the very hall of government itself.
For the traitor appears not traitor - he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and wears their face and their garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation-he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city-he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared."-Cicero 42 B.C.
14. The New Constitution for the United States and the world
Samuel Adams "The perfection of liberty therefore, in a state of nature, is for every man to be free from any external force, and to perform such actions as in his own mind and conscience he judges to be rightest; which liberty no man can truly possess whose mind is enthralled by irregular and inordinate passions; since it is no great privilege to be free from external violence if the dictates are controlled by a force within, which exerts itself above reason."
"But neither the wisest Constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt. He therefore is the truest friend to the liberty of his country who tries most to promote its virtue, and who, so far as his power and influence extend, will not suffer a man to be chosen into any office of power and trust who is not a wise and virtuous man."
--
Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor liberty to purchase power.
"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."
--
On January 17, 1980, the President and Senate confirmed another "Constitution", namely the "Constitution Of The United Nations Industrial Development Organization", found at Senate, Treaty Document No. 97-19, 97th Congress, 1st Session. A perusal of this Foreign Constitution should more than qualify the internationalist intents.
The "Preamble", Article 1 "Objectives" and Article 2 "Functions", clearly evidence their intent to direct, control, finance and subsidize all "natural and human resources" and "agro-related as well as basic industries", through "dynamic social and economic changes" "with a view to assisting in the establishment of a new international economic order." The high flown rhetoric is obviously of "STATE" origin and intents.
An unelected, unrepresentative, unaccountable oligarchy of expatriates and aliens, who fraudulently claim in the Preamble that they intend to establish "rational and equitable international economic relations"; yet openly declared that they no longer "stabilize the value of the dollar", nor "assure the value of the coin and currency of the United States"; is purely misrepresentation, deceit and fraud. (See: Public Law 95-147, 91 Stat. 1227, at pg. 1229)
This was augmented by Public Law 101-167, 103 Stat. 1195, which discloses massive appropriations of re-hypothecated debt credit for the general welfare and common defense of other Foreign Powers, including "Communist" countries or satellites, International control of natural and human resources, etceteras. A "Resource" is a claim of "property", and when related to people constitutes "slavery."
To put it bluntly, the people of the world and the world itself, are the property of the United Nations, IMF, World Bank, and the hidden controllers, to do with as they see fit.
Not so uniquely, this nation is forcing this type of activity into such nations as Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Venezuela, Columbia, China, and any nation which has yet to be fully placed under control, while claiming we are bringing 'freedom, justice and democracy' to the worlds "oppressed', and we bring the 'rule of law', that law being these 'new' rules of law which no common person can live with, as they place them as essentially slaves. Which will not be the peoples of those nations laws, but the controllers laws.
It is now necessary to ask which Constitution they are operating under. The "Constitution For The Newstates Of The United States", which was located at Liberty Lobby, 300 Independence Ave., SE, Washington, D.C. 20003, was the subject matter of the book entitled "The Emerging Constitution" by Rexford G. Tugwell, which was accomplished under the auspices of the Rockefeller tax-exempt foundation called the "Center For The Study of Democratic Institutions".
Recently, we have seen attempts to call a 'constitutional convention'. We can see which constitution is to take the place of this nations true contract. One which they have designed, and under which we have no voice, no control of our lives, no control of our country, no control of our land, or any control of our governments.
"The People and Citizens of this Nation were forewarned against formation of "Democracies."
"Democracies have ever been the spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths." (See: Federalist Papers No. 10; also see, The Law; Fredrick Bastiat; Code Of Professional Responsibility; Preamble).
This Alien Constitution, however, has nothing to do with democracy in reality. Reality places such as the basis of and for a despotic, tyrannical oligarchy as evidenced by:
Article I, "Rights and Responsibilities", Sections 1 and 15, evidence their knowledge of the "emergency."
The Rights of expression, communication, movement, assembly, petition and Habeas Corpus are all excepted from being exercised under and in a "declared emergency."
MARK THIS WELL
The Constitution for the Newstates of America, openly declares, among other seditious activities and collusion, that:
"Until each i