Federal District Court [DCUS]
|
Against
|
Case No.: JURY DEMAND ENDORCED HEREON STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES OCCURRING thru AUGUST 27, 2004; Notices regarding activity thereon NOTICE of unlawful entry upon the court, and record of Geauga court by one Forrest W. Burt, acting without lawful authority and without legal ability on September 14, 2004 via JUDGMENT ENTRY; and via unlawful ORDER OF ARREST (Issuance of Capias), and via prior issuance of ORDER of rescheduling of a matter already finalized through lawful process and proper legal method; FORMAL REQUEST for state judicial investigation of conspiracy to commit apparent unlawful and criminal activities by Forrest W. Burt; David P. Joyce; Robert Taft; and other; agents of GEAUGA COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE; GEAUGA COUNTY CHILD ENFORCEMENT AGENCY and or JOBS AND FAMILY SERVICES; Geauga County Sheriff Department; others as is found upon the face of the record STATE OF OHIO AND FEDERAL MATERIALS: DEMAND for review of permanent removal of Forrest W. Burt and David P. Joyce, Robert Umholts from the bench of Geauga County and from any further contact with the legal system of The United States of America Federal materials bring defendants/respondents for: Conspiracy to defraud the plaintiff's of their lawful and legal rights to due process; Conspiracy to interfere with lawful process; Conspiracy to violate rights of the plaintiff's to legal process and legal proceedings; Conspiracy to inflict deliberate and direct violations of the plaintiff's Constitutional Rights as defined therein; Conspiracy to inflict deliberate and direct emotional and physical harm upon the plaintiff's; Conspiracy to use the courts of America to further unlawful, illegal and apparent criminal activities; Conspiracy to professionally and personally use positions of authority to further unlawful, and or illegal, and or criminal activities in Ohio and these United States of America; Conspiracy to subvert the legal system of the State of Ohio and The United States of America; Other as might be addressed during pendency |
MIXED MULTI JURISDICTIONAL BASIS
The court has jurisdiction under numerous federal laws; Constitutional aspect not limited to the 5th, 6th, 9th, 10th Articles/Amendments and main body; and responsibilities to the American people as defined. These and other aspects have been more fully set forth upon the seven Volumes of the Expose` existing within the Sixth Circuit Administrative Council and or other federal levels or divisions.
Should the parties or the court question such, the Volumes may be obtained there, perhaps from the Supreme Court of The United States of America, or can be presented via CDROM. There lay no question as to the jurisdiction of this court, prosecutability of the defendants/respondents or the issues, or the responsibilities of this court to ensure that they are. Matters to be addressed have affected at least five jurisdictions and three circuits.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The case brings some thirteen years of organized conspiracy to subvert American law and justice by the defendant/respondent parties. These parties have knowingly used their official positions to further illegal, unlawful and criminal activities, using at times, apparent extortion, or strong arm tactics against the plaintiffs.
During the course of these 13 years all defendant/respondents have been advised of unlawful, illegal, and criminal activities occurring within their realm of responsibilities and duties. All have actively and knowingly chosen to participate, compounding the others unlawful and or illegal and or criminal acts with their own, in open conspiracy, in obstruction of justice, and in deliberate attempt to destroy American law and justice from within.
SHORT SUMMATION OF RECENT ACTIVITIES
This document sets forth events and occurrences leading up to and on the 27th day of August in 2004, and unlawful activities produced thereto.
The Geauga County Clerk of Court is directed to prepare and present the records of Geauga County to the federal Grand Jury for review of possible Indictments.
You shall advise Maurice Edward, Brahier of when the materials are to be presented so he may direct the apparent issues to the Grand Jury.
Notices to parties concerning such activities and resultant action.
On the 21st day of August of 2004, Preble County Sheriff Deputies (2) and a Ohio State Highway Patrolman attempted to arrest Maurice Edward, Brahier on Capias issued on the 22nd day of October of 2003, by clerk of court in Geauga County for Court of Common Pleas. Allegation extended/reason for issuance was for a supposed failure to appear for a SHOW OF CAUSE hearing on the 14th day of October of 2003. Inquiry was placed to officers to verify this Capias as no ORDER had been received by Maurice. Arrest was not performed as the Capias could not be verified. Maurice proceeded to write a document to the Geauga County Clerk of Court, which he faxed to that Court and elsewhere as so noted upon the document (copy attached). Document is listed as Geauga-Preble-Sixth Ct-New false arrest and imprisonment attempt-Aug 22 04.doc (as documented in the Administrative Council of the Sixth Circuit Court).
Preble County Sheriff Deputies came back that morning (22nd) after verifying supposed validity of Capias. Maurice Edward, Brahier was thereafter incarcerated in Preble County pending pick-up by Geauga County Sheriff Officers. Preble Sheriff deputies, and later jail personnel, were advised of the document which was to be placed in Preble County Court. Sheriff Officers and or jail Officers refused to fax or hand deliver document to the Preble court (verifiable by two written requests in Preble Jail files).
Preble County Court (at televised hearing) was apprised of afore stated document in Maurice's possession. Court and or judge made no effort to obtain or review the document.
Maurice verbally advised judge of unlawful activities occurring in Geauga County and the resultant unlawful activities [such as false arrest and imprisonment] in which Preble County was now involved. Judge indicated he would supposedly advise the Preble County Prosecutor Office and have them contact Maurice. No such activity apparently occurred. Instead, transportation was authorized by Preble judge.
In the first person, the injured Maurice Edward, Brahier
I was transported to Geauga County by Geauga County Sheriff's Officers and held unlawfully in Geauga County Jail pending a supposed SHOW OF CAUSE, over which the court had neither authority to hold (due to the lawful ending of such in the seventh month of 2003) or authority to review or issue orders or judgment, save what had been requested in the relief of the timed Motion to Dismiss and other Notices.
Supposed plaintiff's of that state action [now listed as defendant/respondents] had been afforded opportunity to respond, deny, or otherwise upon the record. No response or otherwise was entered.
Notices were placed upon the Geauga court record concerning the Motion to Dismiss, resultant failures by respondent plaintiffs, request for relief as exhibited upon Maurice's Motions and or Notices.
I requested a copy of the supposed ORDER, which had not been sent to me, concerning the FAILURE TO APPEAR and Capias issuance.
---------
Forrest W. Burt stated he had received the afore stated faxed document [attached](though it was sent to the clerk) upon opening of the supposed hearing. I reminded him of the Motion to Dismiss, and the process had ended in the 7th month of 2003 through use of proper procedure.
The SHOW OF CAUSE hearing was allowed to continue, flaunting the unlawful aspects of the allowance.
Attending this supposed hearing were representatives of GEAUGA COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE and GEAUGA COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY {JOBS AND FAMILY SERVICES}.
Prosecutor attempted to bring issue of supposed Order to continually advise court of my work; seeking work; and other, via Agency representative.
Prosecutor and CSED Agency representative presented as evidence a sum certain of supposed child support owned by myself, with poundages, arrearages, and other.
Prosecutor extended as supposed fact, Orders, which were supposedly issued by the Geauga Court.
---
Upon my cross-examination of the Agency representative, the issue of the Agency's participation in seeking review of Geauga Court orders; sought within another state [Kentucky] was again raised. Which had been extended to that state through and by perjuries in affidavit by Gail S. Brahier, and Lake County Prosecutor's Office, and the CSED Agency in Lake county, as they were directly involved in the commission of state and federal felonies, and state and federal violations of rights.
I thereafter addressed (again, issue had been raised in prior hearings) the fact that the CSED Agency, which she was representing, had been informed of this unlawful and criminal activity, as had the Lake County Prosecutor's Office, the CSED Agency of that county, and numerous others such as Robert Taft {then Secretary of State, the party certifying the documents to Kentucky} [previously addressed under federal complaint - see records: Maurice Edward, Brahier vs. {parties} Western District Court].
I questioned (again, issue raised in prior hearings) whether she had any information whether Lake County or the Agency, which she represented, had ever civilly or criminally prosecuted Gail S. Brahier for this unlawful and illegal activity.
Her response was she had no information.
I questioned (again, this question had been raised in prior hearings) whether the Agency had finally brought or attempted to obtain the fact that I had been injured do to the false arrest and imprisonment in a Kentucky prison due to this unlawful and criminal activity, to which she, as the Agency's representative was now a fellow conspirator from Social Security as had been exposed during prior supposed SHOW OF CAUSE hearings. The reply was only that the Agency had found that I had been injured.
I questioned (again, issue has been repeatedly raised over 13 years) whether she was aware that by bringing this action to the court or appearing in the court, she was aiding and abetting violators of the law and as such, became an active participant. No response.
I questioned (again, issue raised repeatedly in prior hearings) whether she was aware that ignorance of the law or of conspiracy does not absolve any party of guilt or complicity, particularly when that party has been advised of such. No response.
I questioned whether she or the Agency, having been repeatedly advised over the course of some thirteen years, had ever investigated the facts which I had presented to the Agency concerning illegal and unlawful activities in the county, the court, and other; or had advised any proper authorities.
She had no information.
I again advised this supposed witness and CSED Agency representative, of the occurrences in the court, the county, and various applicable unlawful and or illegal activities; and resultant legal aspects, such as the participation in perjuries and violations of rights; and the civil and criminal prosecution at the state and federal level for participation.
Other matter was addressed as more fully set forth upon the record.
--
Forrest W. Burt excused the witness for the prosecution, and asked whether I had any witnesses for defense. Of course the matter had been attended to previously, over the course of these thirteen or so years, as is displayed upon the face of the 1400+ documents in court record to which I had previously directed him.
However, since Forrest W. Burt was knowingly conspiring with these others, he instead suggested I should allow him to examine me. I made distinct statements regarding such (review of the record is required), and granted this opportunity.
Immediately upon being placed under Oath, I swore to the validity of all presented issues in documents which I submitted in the court's records. Moreover, I swore to all presented material issues which I had raised at that unlawful hearing.
Questions were placed to me by Forrest W. Burt concerning:
Whether I had work (he was well aware that I did as that had been presented in the prior SHOWS OF CAUSE),
where I worked (also previously presented),
income (none, as had already been placed in the records),
the injury (also presented in prior hearings),
other as is displayed upon the record.
I again advised the judge of the unlawfulness of the hearing, his knowing active participation in unlawful and illegal activities, and other.
---
Forrest W. Burt questioned the prosecutor on concerning what she requested for relief. The prosecutor suggested 30 or more days in jail, seek work order, and other relief.
Forrest W. Burt issued determination that I would spend seven days in jail, I would pay the costs of the proceeding, and the prosecutor would write the order.
On the 14th of September the court finally issued the supposed JUDGMENT ENTRY concerning the hearing on August 27th of 2004. However, review of the envelope (copy attached) shows this was not mailed until September 24th of 2004 by David P. Joyce of Geauga county Prosecutor Office.
SHORT STATEMENT CONCERNING PRIOR ATTEMPTS TO BRING THESE PARTIES TO JUSTICE
I have brought these or other conspirators to all of the legally responsible parties within Ohio, whom have not provided their duties and responsibilities concerning this unlawful and illegal activity. I have also brought them before the Justice Department, and other Agencys. I have brought various federal complaints against other apparent conspirator parties within the Western District of Kentucky court.
These defendants/respondents have actively and knowingly conspired to commit acts of aggression against the people of The United States of America. Moreover, they have willfully conspired to subvert and destroy the justice system of a state and the United States with their continued activities. These deliberate acts of terrorism may not be ignored.
Relief
Due to the nature of these illegal and unlawful activities, and the extended period (13 years as of 2004) in which they have occurred, the plaintiffs/ complainants have personally suffered immeasurable harm and damage; they request the court order:
- Submission of Geauga County court records to the United States Attorney Office, and presentation to the federal Grand Jury for indictments.
- Copies of the Geauga County Court records and federal District Court records be brought before this court for full review.
- Damages in the amount of one point two (1.2) billion dollars in addition to the fines, the costs of this proceeding, and other normally granted or imposed.
- Other equitable relief as might be required or appropriate.
So stated this Monday, October 04, 2004 by Maurice Edward, Brahier.