Office of the Clerk
Geauga County, State of Ohio
Former case listing: 91-DC-000792
FROM:
Maurice Edward, Brahier
2871 US 35E
West Alexandria, Ohio
IN RE: attempted false arrest and imprisonment on non-existent and or unlawfully entered ORDER and or false or fraudulent issuance of Capias
____________________________________________________________________
On Saturday the 21st day of August of 2004, late evening, an attempt to serve warrant and or Capias upon my person from your county occurred by two Preble County Sheriffs and one Ohio State Patrolman. Warrant was rejected by myself. Upon checking with local authorities, officers did not serve said warrant due to improper and or other failure by parties within your county and court to follow proper procedures, which is nothing new for you or your court, of course. Apparently lawful and legal activities are foreign to you.
I advise you to carefully review your records. The case was finalized by and through lawful use of court procedure and process as follows:
Geauga County\Motion to dismiss 06-13-03- GEAUGA COUNTY.doc
Pages 2-7
1. The judgment and or orders under which the court attempts to proceed were unlawfully and illegally obtained due to obstruction of justice, destruction of evidence, perjury, fraud (intrinsic and extrinsic), conspiracy to commit fraud, and other criminal acts which were indicated by directing the court to wit:
A. review it’s own record;
B. my statements to the court concerning the destruction of the Lake County records by the plaintiff (and their false certification under subpoena), and my attempted prosecution (via Geauga County sheriff, Prosecutor Office; the record additionally shows Attorney General, State Police, Supreme Court, and elsewhere) and or other’s prosecution of Gail S. Brahier for such;
C. the ensuing perjury committed by Gail S. Brahier and her "boss" (a witness during the supposed original hearing (91DC000792));
D. the handicapping and or disability under which I am now forced to live due to perjuries in affidavit submitted by Gail S. Brahier and Child Support (Lake County) to the State of Kentucky which cause two (2) years of false imprisonment therein (which the Secretary of State of Ohio and the Attorney General of Ohio and the Governor of Ohio and Lake County-Ohio prosecutor and Lake County-Ohio Court and others were supplied with evidence of);
E. the proper showing of cause with irrefutable and or undeniable informations and or evidence to the former prosecutor and child support representative (from whence this supposed contempt and or failure to appear stems), and the failure of that prosecutor to:
1. comply with ethics, laws, Rules, duties and responsibilities of office and profession, and other, wherein she was required to;
a. request dismissal of that action; choosing, instead, to continue selective and malicious prosecution of a victim of criminal acts and actions under unlawfully and or criminally obtained judgment(s) and Order(s);
A. I had provided my duties and obligations under law and rule, I had shown cause to the party requesting such, wherefore I was not required to further appear.
F. the failure of any prior judge in this purported 91DC000792 and it’s appeals, to:
1. provide full and adequate equal access, due process and other Rights and Law;
2. proceed properly pursuant to civil rules, rules of court, and other rules required for proper law and justice in America;
3. proceed fully and properly under law, ethics, rules, and law;
G. that no court or judge in America may allow the prosecution of, or continued actions against one whom has had these violations of law, Right, rule, code, statute, and other perpetrated against them; and any court and that any judge whom comes in contact with these unlawful and or criminal activities must make every effort<>take aggressive action against those who have sought to subvert and pervert or obstruct or deny law and justice in America or they fail to provide their duties and responsibilities;
H. that the supposed jurisdiction of this case was falsely and fraudulently obtained. Moreover, the jurisdictional issues upon which the court had jurisdiction, eg. (sic) the criminal activities perpetrated by the plaintiff and other party conspirators were ignored, and the prosecution of those criminal acts was refused or denied; and relief from these unlawfully obtained judgments and orders was denied; all in violation of the laws, statutes, Rules, ethics, due process, and other as is required for and of lawful proceedings in America.
I. that the plaintiff had used the court to obtain custody and other, which she could not have obtained in the home state of Kentucky, due to:
1. the evidence obtainable there concerning her pregnancies and abortions: five (5) pregnancies-three (3) abortions, the last just prior to her removing the children from Kentucky and the ensuing vasectomy which I had to ensure she aborted no more of my children;
2. the fact that the resume (designed to get her a job) she submitted could not be presented to a court due to the fact that those parties had personal knowledge of lawsuits filed against the plaintiff for failing to maintain her parks properly and children being injured;
3. the fact that it should have been obvious to this court that the parties claiming knowledge {in the resume`} of the plaintiff’s home life and her concern for her family could not have been known, by most, by those individuals of the resume` due to the hundreds of miles which separated them from the family and the fact that they never came into contact with the family (unless at a convention at which I was the one taking care of the children) in the home, as was evidenced in Kentucky.
J. that the order stems from deliberately unlawful or illegal activities by the prior magistrate and judge due to the factual issues:
1. the magistrate (Mr. Mullins?) was served with questions of law which he was required to place answers to upon the face of the record by rule and law, he chose instead to strike such from the record. A judge or one acting on behalf of a court may not strike questions of law from the record, nor may they fail to answer such questions, it is their responsibility and duty to do so by law and rule, and the responsibilities and duties of office and profession;
2. objection to the striking of the questions was placed in the record; the magistrate struck the objection from the record in violation of law and rule, no judge or magistrate may strike objections to their activities;
3. objection to the striking of the objection to the striking of the questions was submitted to the record which was also struck from the record, which shows beyond refute that this supposed magistrate is unfit to hold judicial power in anywhere in America, he could not strike these objections from the record without deliberately violating due process, the rules of court, the laws applicable to lawful proceedings, and the rights of individuals in the courts of America;
4. The reviewing party (Mr. Inderlied) (Note: modified by next submission to Forrest W. Burt) took it upon himself to render judgment concerning the record of the case stating "no objection had been filed" which is a deliberate falsehood and in violation of law, due process, judicial responsibilities, rule and other. To issue such statements concerning the record he must have requested the record be refreshed with the struck documents, particularly when that was the reason for his review (the striking of documents from the record, failure to provide due process). He, however, did not, in violation of his capacity as judge, rules, Rights, due process, law and justice. He has shown obvious disrespect for his position, the court, and the law, which he purports to provide and protect and preside within.
WHEREAS, these issues (among the numerous other violations of Right, law, rule, code, statute, and other perpetrated upon myself and the children, which appear in this fraudulent action upon the face of the record) are more than sufficient to show cause levied against any purported contempt or failure to appear, the court must therefore dismiss this matter, and bar/forbid further prosecution of Maurice Edward, Brahier pursuant 91DC000792 in protection of law and justice in America, and otherwise relieve Maurice Edward and the children from these criminally obtained unlawful judgments and orders in its duties and responsibilities to the people of the community, the State, and these United States of America.
Contempt may only be founded upon lawful orders and judgments, proper court proceeding, and other lawful acts and actions.
I remind this court I need not resupply (they appear upon the face of the record) the rules, laws, or any other indication or otherwise save that which I already have, it is the responsibility and duty of this court is to ensure justice is served without sale, denial, or delay (Bill of Rights – Constitutions of Ohio and United States of America).
Dated this 14th day of June, 2003
Geauga County\Notice of and correction - June 18, 2003 filing.doc
Geauga County\NOTICES-RELIEF-OTHER - July 02 2003.doc pages 1-3
"3. The time limitation for response by the GEAUGA COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE is at end. Therefore the court will place the legally and lawfully mandated relief upon the face of the record of this fraudulent and illegal and unlawful 91DC000792, or it will continue as an active and willing participant in deliberate violations of Rights and other criminal activities (see records – state and Federal).
4. Further, it will properly notify all parties whom have proceeded unlawfully and illegally under and or by and or through this mockery of justice, such as: this and other states; and their courts, so they might correct the records and other within them; and other like relief as is normally applied and or required such as damages (see records – state and federal) and return of any and all moneys, fees, costs and otherwise, paid by Maurice Edward, Brahier."
Geauga County\Denise M Kaminski - payment 00G002269 -07-05-03.doc
Geauga County\Notice-licensing-hardship-ORDER to appear.doc 08-19-03
NOTICES extend to the above and pursuant to:
1. On or about December 30th, 2002 I received NOTICE (dated December 27, 2002, Case 70077-16231) from GEAUGA COUNTY CSEA (an apparent instrument of STATE OF OHIO de-facto corporation) that they had removed, held or otherwise impaired my drivers license under 3123.41 to 3123.62 of STATE OF OHIO’s statutory by-laws. They were properly, and had previously been properly,notified by contact from myself, of the unlawful, illegal and criminal aspects of the ORDER(s) under which they were trying to administer. This agency and its agents and officers appear quite willing to administer under unlawful, illegal, and criminal activities, evidenced by their continued activities and actions. I have been unable to drive since that date.
2. Due to this unlawful hindrance/removal of my driving RIGHT (RIGHT (since I am one of the people of America not an enfranchised subject of any government or corporation) to travel unless by lawful measure and due course of law) my vehicle licensing has also now expired, as I can not license my vehicle when my license has been suspended or otherwise hindered, or impaired due to Insurance which has lapsed as well, since licensing is also required to obtain such, at an affordable rate.
3. I hold CSEA, GEAUGA COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE, this court, and their agent provocateurs directly and personally responsible for this unlawful activity.
4. I am supposedly under ORDER to appear before the court on Wednesday September 10th, of 2003 under an unlawfully and illegally based action in this court for a MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE. Cause has been shown upon the face of the record. MOTION TO DISMISS and other relief was filed, opportunity to respond/reply [benefit of discussion] was afforded to opposing parties(y), none was presented. All opposing parties have waived right to submit further matters, materials, informations or otherwise, to the court. The court has failed to act upon the MOTION in violation of its’ duties and responsibilities, displaying its’ open disregard for procedure, rules, codes, and other, such as RIGHTs of the people of The United States of America.
5. As I have no intention of allowing false arrest and imprisonment to occur again pursuant my supposed failure to appear in this false and fraudulent action, supposedly before the court on the 10th of September, and I have no intent to walk dozens of miles (since GEAUGA COUNTY is apparently not part of RTA or has bus service and I have already been forced to do so upon two (2) prior occasions due to false arrest and imprisonment) I will be driving my vehicle to Geauga County for this ORDERED appearance in this unlawful and illegal action before the court. I object to this ORDER and being forced to appear in an unlawful action before this court.
It is not my intent or purpose to break the driving or licensing or road laws of this state, but this IS a direct and open furtherance by this court and CSEA to remain instruments, participants, and provocateurs, which will directly force this behavior due to this continued unlawful and illegal activity pursuant 91DC000792. As stated hereon, I will hold all parties personally responsible and liable for any problems, fines, or other, which might occur.
NOTICE of these matters is hereby placed upon the face of Geauga County’s public records, in this fraudulent 91DC000792.
Dated this 18th day of August, 2003
Geauga County\FINAL NOTICES no case no cost.doc
PC: Federal District Court, Western District of Kentucky 09-18-03
In its entirety:
COMMON PLEAS COURT OF GEAUGA COUNTY
IN RE: document issued in violation of and absence of court authority AND JURISDICTION on SEPTEMBER 8, 2003
defunct action CASE 91DC000792
GAIL S. BRAHIER
V.
MAURICE E. BRAHIER
FINAL NOTICES (1 of 2)
I have received a document for which the court lacks jurisdiction and authority to issue.
On the 10th day of September of 2003, I drove hundreds of miles (51/2 – 6 hours) to appear under a supposed extrajudicial action under essential order to do so, at 1:30 p.m.. I was only released from unlawful and illegal imprisonment if I assured Forrest W. Burt I would appear. No JUDGMENT ENTRIES or hearings were found upon the Sheriff/entry officers log and or paper work upon arrival at the court regarding me.
Proceeding to the clerk’s office, I was advised some supposed hearing was rescheduled. It took a considerable time to locate this unlawful and illegal activity, of which I had not been informed of in a timely fashion. I was more than irritated. Apparently the document had been issued two days before I was to appear, Postal delivery put it distinctly at a time when I would have to be enroute to the court. I suggest this was a deliberate act as this type of activity has been used, both at this level and at the appellate, previously.
Moreover, the court has no authority to issue such rescheduling as there is no Motion to Show Cause before the court, NOTICED properly upon the face of the record of the court. That action ended months ago (7th month of 2003) using proper court procedure via a time limited Motion to Dismiss that expired. The court has no authority or jurisdiction to issue this attempted rescheduling or receive any additional material, briefs, motions or any thing else pursuant GAIL S. BRAHIER v. MAURICE E. BRAHIER or anything related to it, unless I submit it, as there is, now, no such action or case (It has never existed lawfully as it was unlawfully, illegally and criminally obtained).
THE COURT HAS BEEN REQUIRED TO ENTER THE DISMISSAL AND OTHER REQUESTED RELIEF SINCE THE SEVENTH MONTH OF 2003. AS THERE IS NO JUDGE NOT IMPLICATED IN THIS COURT AND THE APPELLATE, OR APPARENTLY IN THE STATE, IT SHOULD BE TRANSFERRED TO FEDERAL COURT.
IN RE: supposed money due for a forced appeal which did not occur
(2 of 2) NOTICE TO THE CLERK AND COURT
I have also been receiving terroristic letters from the clerk’s office of this court regarding some supposed appeal and supposed money owed. This was forced attempt at an appeal which did not occur, due in part, to a failure of the clerk to setup payment scheduling in an action which had no jurisdiction or authority to have occurred in the first place.
As recovery of fees and cost is requested AND is generally applied, if the court feels it deserves some sort of money for services NOT performed in an action which was unlawfully held, it may pay itself this supposed cost or fee for this non-existent appeal from the damages and I will recover that cost or fee.
[signature area]
C:\My Documents\Courts and BOC\Ohio\Geauga County\FINAL NOTICE no case no cost.doc
PC: Federal District Court, Western District of Kentucky - see prior cases concerning this matter
______________________________ and finally
TO: Pat Shantz
Child Support Enforcement Division
Geauga County, Ohio
IN RE: communication from your agency and you; received July 9, 2004
RE: non existent authority, fraudulent attempt to administer without authority
From:
Maurice Edward, Brahier
_____________________________
In 2002 and 2003 this supposed case which you purport to proceed pursuant too, was shown as fraudulently and criminally obtained by Gail S. Brahier and others. Your agency was properly advised, as you were a party thereto. Moreover, your supposed jurisdiction is non-existent, also a fact established.
This is not a request for administrative review or hearing.
This is your agency, and your personal, final advisement of these facts, before civil and criminal charges are placed against you.
Before you or your agency proceed in the same moronic fashion which you and or others of your agency and your county have continued under for over thirteen years, believing perhaps you are above the reach of law, I advise you, that your county officials, judges and others whom are and were involved will be prosecuted civilly and criminally, as will others in your state. Many will face death qualified juries.
Just as various parties in the Sixth Circuit and various federal judges and others presently are, whom also mistakenly thought they were above the reach of law or otherwise immune. Of course, they are not, and neither are you.
For indication of the applicable law which applies to you personally, I suggest you review, at least Title 42 USC 1981-2000h, noting (in the notations, etc.) specifically the rulings concerning parties, such as yourself and your agency, who knowingly commit violations of law or rights, or attempt to, or knowingly participate, directly or indirectly, in fraud; extortion; harboring, aiding or abetting; unlawful destruction of credit; and the like, which are federal crimes for which you may be prosecuted.
If you wish further materials, you may request the seven (7) Volumes of IN EXPOSE` OF FRAUD, MISDEMEANORS, TREASONABLE ACTS AND OTHER, now in the Sixth Circuit and the Supreme Court of The United States of America. Volumes V and VI might be of particular interest to you, as what they address applies to you personally, and your agency as well, and may be brought against you in a court of law.
As there are no orders, cases, arrearages or other from which you may claim administrative privilege or authority, you are acting without any protection or immunity, real or imagined.
Public evidence and record: 07/09/04 05:21:37 PM C:\My Documents\Courts and BOC\Ohio\Child Support\Geauga County-final advisement.doc
Sent on the 10th day of July, 2004 to Pat Shantz at Geauga County CSED
signature block removed
________________________
If your prosecutors Office or other agent, has brought an action or otherwise before this court, claiming continued authority upon a case which they are well aware was finalized in 2003, and is and remains outside lawful activities in this nation, then they have deliberately brought this court into further fraudulent, unlawful, and criminal activity. Once again, using this court in mockery of justice and in violation of law. I suggest you pursue action against them.
Before you attempt to use these same fraudulent, criminally obtained judgments/orders, and unlawful activities, you have used for the last 13+ years; I advise you that the Sixth Circuit is presently reviewing matters which concern your fraudulent activities and criminal behavior as part of another matter, and will receive a copy of this document, as will others.
If you bring me under false arrest into your county, again, I assure you I will tolerate none of this, as you were previously apprised.
You have issued Capias (arrest warrant) without lawful or legal authority.
You, therefore, will correct this unlawful activity brought to your attention or be liable for your failure to comply with law and your deliberate abuse and destruction of it.
Sent via fax to Geauga County Court on the 22nd day of August, 2003
copies:
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals - Administrative Council
Preble County Court
And elsewhere