Maurice Edward, Brahier, a private individual of the People in his sovereignty, on behalf of the People of Ohio state and States united
xxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxx, Ohio state

In The Supreme Court of The State of Ohio

ComplaintS filed against the organized criminal element now masquerading as the courts, prosecutor's office, the Eleventh District Court of Appeals, and other parties as addressed hereon. Segments may be handle in the form of Appeal of judgements and or rulings/orders.

CASE ________________________________ for full court and independent investigation, special Grand Jury

___________________________________________________

The matters stem from the cases as you and or your Disciplinary Counsel were previously advised. Original Case; 91DC000792 Geauga: containing the continued unlawful and or criminal behavior of attorneys, judges, prosecutors, sheriffs and others; in active participation therein. A short history follows {Matters extend over the course of ten (10) years}.

• A. 1990-91 (Christmas/New Years): one Gail Susan, (Davis) Brahier; takes children of the marriage from Kentucky to this state. Whereabouts were originally unknown. Issue was abduction/kidnapping (PKPA, UCCJA).
• B. Numerous occurrences for the next several months: set forth within the records.
• C. Gail Susan integrates herself within the state government in Ohio (1991-ongoing).
• D. Gail Susan files for Divorce and Custody in Ohio. Attempts were made to bring the matter before a proper court, that being in Kentucky; refused.
• E. Material is subpoenaed through Geauga from Gail's work in Lake County. The material is falsified. Apparently by her Boss, the keeper of records, and Gail Susan.
• F. Numerous attempts at equal justice, equal access to justice, and other pertinent issues are brought before the court in Geauga, all where refused.
• G. An attorney, hired by Maurice Edward, Brahier (myself), is supplied with all of the household records, INCLUDING evidence of tampered with/falsified records as subpoenaed. He fails to present any witnesses or evidence except the subpoenaed records and Maurice, during trial. He then leaves the case immediately after trial. (Richard P. Zie(ei)gler)
• H. Gail and her Boss certify under oath that the records are truthful and complete.
• I. Gail Susan and others make various other statements, which are deliberately misleading and or false.
• J. Custody is given to Gail (4/92). Appeal is filed.
• K. Matters are brought by Maurice Edward: before the Geauga County Prosecutors office (1992-3) for the prosecution of various crimes and or violations committed.
  Matters are also brought before the Geauga County Sheriff (1992-3), Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of The State of Ohio (against judges and attorneys) (1992-5), Governors Office (1992-5), Secretary of State (1992-5), Attorney General (1992-5), State Patrol/Police (1992), Geauga City Police (1992-3); and others.
  The matters are also brought to the attention of this Court (1992-present).
  The Prosecutors refused to take action; the Sheriff's Office refused to accept the evidence and or take action; the Disciplinary Counsel supposedly investigates but fails to take action when information is supplied to them which would bring proper prosecution (Complaints against: Hans R. Veit; Richard P. Ziegler; various members Common Pleas and Eleventh District Courts); The Governor apparently ignores the matters; the Attorney General fails to take proper action; the Secretary of State fails to take proper action; the Ohio State Patrol ignores the matters. The Court fails to act or allow such.
• L. The Appellate Court (Eleventh District) exonerates the criminal activity of these and other parties as is reflected in the Appeals filed therein. They claim no law is ever broken, no rights ever violated, no unjustified or unjustifiable behavior. The members actively participate in this organized criminal activity.
  However, in the first Appeal (93G1705), the record/transcript is falsified/destroyed, though certified as truthful and complete by the Court Reporter and or Clerk. Again, the Appellate Judges find no problem with this criminal activity, this violation of Law, Right and responsibility.
• M. Geauga County Court of Common Pleas openly flaunts upon its public records, the ready willingness to continue further fraudulent and criminal behavior. Relief from judgments is refused; prosecution of these parties is refused; it continues selectively and maliciously to prosecute in its Court; the supposed Judges and magistrates therein, past and present, embrace and support this criminal and other unlawful activities within it.
• N. Contact is made with Federal Authorities (US House and Senate, President, US Attorney General, FBI, US Marshall Service, Pentagon - 1993-96) to bring these parties to justice: for proper investigation and prosecution; none is taken.
• O. Affidavits and records are submitted to the State of Kentucky under URESA by Gail Susan and CSEA. However, the affidavit submitted contains perjuries.
  Maurice advises Lake County Court of Common Pleas (Ohio), the Secretary of State (Ohio), the Governors Office (Ohio and Kentucky), Lake County Prosecutor (Ohio), and others.
  Lake County Officials apparently fail to take full and or proper action (the evidence is never requested from Maurice).
  Moreover, Kentucky refuses to take action against the perjuries.
  That Court refuses to address the issues of perjury and other falsifications, and Maurice is later sent to prison for two years (1996), AFTER that judge refuses to allow any evidence/information submitted by Maurice Edward, advising the Jury that defendants need not supply evidence.
  Part of that evidence/information is a letter showing the perjury contained in the affidavit used to institute the original action in Kentucky and Ohio.
  Maurice is handicapped/disabled/injured while in prison. He returns to Ohio in 1999/2000.
• P. Geauga County Court of Common Pleas continues to allow various unlawful and or criminal behaviors within it, as recently as 2000.
  The Prosecutors Office continues to act in an unlawful manner.
  Such as: A Prosecutor refuses or fails to provide evidence/information/document(s) during a supposed action within the Court, the Judge and or magistrate and the Eleventh District Court of Appeals ignore and or sanctify this and other violation of Right and Law.
  A supposed judge (Eleventh District- Robert A. Nader, a party actively participating in the original cases) claims a failure to prosecute, though the Brief and memorandum is filed with onset of Appeal, the clerk of Court claims the record has been supplied.
  However, no docketing statements, assignment to calendar, and otherwise is apparently issued by the Appellate Court.
• Q. Now the Clerk of Court and Geauga County Prosecutor's Office and CSEA attempt to bring further actions against Maurice Edward.
  Apparently attempting to extort monies for this unlawful activity, and coerce acceptance of this unlawful and or criminal behavior.

SUMMARY

Ohio has, over ten years, actively harbored, aided, and abetted, violators of Law, Rights and justice.
The supposed Legal System and enforcement/ investigative agencies continue to display their open hostility towards the people; willingness to selectively prosecute, refuse Rights, refuse to provide functions of Office, and otherwise act in a manner of pure political nature rather than provide their proper responsibilities and duties.

Maurice Edward therefore brings charges of organized crime, misprision, and other, as is found and or contained within the state's records, against these parties.

RELIEF

Maurice Edward will tolerate no more fraud, collusion, perjury, selective and malicious prosecution, and any other criminal and or hostile behavior by any party. He therefore brings these complaints and Appeals before this Court. He specifically requests independent special investigation and Grand Jury.

CAUTIONARIES

He reminds this Court that it has also actively participated in this activity, when it assigned "handpicked" retired judges to review the original case; bringing the members of this Court under suspicion of complicity.

He forewarns this Court: that should it fail to provide its function to the people of this state and these United States of America; this will be deemed as an open display of this Court and its Judges active participation in organized crime; he therefore will proceed to actively remove any and all authority from this Court, as the people have, forever, the inherent Right to do so, within themselves.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ohio state

Maurice Edward, Brahier, a private individual of the People in his sovereignty, on behalf of the People of Ohio state and States united

CERTIFICATION OF DELIVERY

The signatory below affirms he has sent this document saved as "Complaint-Appeal 2000.doc" with the attached cover document "Ohio Supreme Court 10-30-00 Docket Statement.doc" without the attached "Response to June 5-2000- Nader.doc" (which they have previously received or have ready access to) on this 31st day of October of the two thousandth year (2000) via regular (with delivery confirmation) United States messenger service (USPS) to:

GEAUGA CLERK OF COURTS, Courthouse, Chardon, Ohio;

Geauga County Prosecutor Office, Courthouse Annex, Chardon, Ohio;

Attorney General, Ohio;

Governor's Office, (effecting service on Governor in his present and former Official and personal capacity);

Secretary of State, Ohio;

In addition, elsewhere via various forms of communication/distribution methods.