In the constitutional Court of record of Geauga County,

its purported lawful Common Pleas
Supposed case no: 91-DC-000792
GAIL BRAHIER
VS.
MAURICE BRAHIER
whoever this misnomer/nom de guerre party is

______________________________________

In regard: the supposed matters purported as before Magistrate Mullen on the sixteenth day of the eleventh month of Nineteen-hundred and Ninety-nine in a supposed Constitutionally based Court.

Maurice Edward, Brahier, once more, places Notice he will waiver no Rights, privileges or immunities; and any party, Agency, representative or otherwise, who violates my Rights, Law, or otherwise, is hereby placed upon proper Notice, they may be prosecuted both civilly and >criminally.

______________________________________

Once more, Maurice Edward, Brahier places proper Notice of the continued objection to the unlawful refusal and or failure of the instigators to file their required replies to the Interrogatories/Questions. He also places continued objection to the unlawful activities of Magistrate Mullen, including, but not limited to, his refusal to answer the questions presented to him as this purported Constitutional Court's representative.

________________________________________

Regarding the supposed counsel to be sought: Maurice Edward, Brahier will not accept one of the Courts own Officers. He has no desire to be placed as in forma non compentens(es), a supposed ward of the Court, at the mercy of some possible incompetent or otherwise, Attorney.

___________________________________________

The record should reflect that Maurice Edward, Brahier, advised Mr. Mullen that there was a conflicting Order superceding the supposed lawfully obtained Order/Judgement of this Court.

__________________________________

The instigators continue to attempt to coerce acceptance of fraudulently or otherwise unlawfully obtained judgements/Orders of this supposed lawfully based Court. I continue to object to these unlawful and or fraudulent Orders/Judgements, and this coercion.

_____________________________________

I indicated I would waiver one issue only (self incrimination in this particular instance only), which could have included an Order/Judgement, which superceded this Court's supposed lawfully obtained Judgement/Order. I find I must only supply what I have supplied. However, I offer the attached scanned document which proves both existence of another Order, and, falsely certified statements from Joanne Milahaki concerning the supposed amount and viability of this Court's supposed lawful Order. Since CSED submitted the matter to the other state, it knows full well of it's fraudulent statements and unlawful activity. Further, since CSEA is a sister Agency of CSED, which shares information, this also shows beyond debate they know of their unlawful activities.

This information can not be used against me, as this Court is well aware.

____________________________________

The prosecutor indicated, when questioned, that she (with)held a letter from Gail Susan, Brahier, concerning the supposed issues before the Court. I will require a complete copy of this letter.

_____________________________________

Wherefore, since I have supplied only that which I am required to supply, the Court will take proper action to end this unlawful and unconstitutional activity by the instigators.
signature block removed - A private individual in his sovereignty, of the People
Presently at xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ohio
xxxxxxxxxx

Certified as sent to:
Joanne Milihaki
Gail Susan, (Davis)Brahier
Geauga County Prosecutors Office

This eighteenth day of the eleventh month of Nineteen-hundred and Ninty-nine, Anno Domini.

image of KY CSED DOCUMENT removed