Peoples' Counsel Home
Contact Us
Ruffstuff's Blog
Peoples' Counsel Blog
Site Map
Expose` of Crimes Volume 1 11-09-99
Expose` Of Crimes Volume II 12-19-02
Expose` of Crimes Volume III 02-26-04
Expose` Of Crimes Volume IV
Expose` of Crimes Volume V 04-11-04
Expose` of Crimes Volume VI 04-23-04
Expose` of Crimes Volume VIII 02-25-04
5-03-CV-258R, the final federal case before judicial complaints and cases
12-27-04 Peoples Response to southern Ohio USDC refusals & corruption
01-05-05 DCUSA activities
01-29-05 Response to refusal to file
Response to defendant Ovington 02-09-05 ORDERS
04-27-05 defendant Rice ORDER Dismissing Demand for Grand Jury & Certification of Questions to The Supreme Court
Peoples' 05-26-05 Response to fraudulent Order
PDF of 6th Circuit attempt to assign request as Appeal
Response to 6th Circuit attempt to assign request as Appeal
Kentucky Supreme Court Case 98-SC-916-AO The People vs COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
1998 Kentucky attempt to prosecute for persisent offender with criminally obtained judgements
Ohio 1991 to present, courts, AGENCIES, and other
Senate Report 93-549 Termination of The National Emergency
sunset_mod.png Peoples' Counsel presents:
the "real world" of Law, Justice and government
A Peoples' Counsel Website
link to http://peoplescounsel.orgfree.com

Your layman's guide to the "real" world of Law, justice, and government.



In the Constitutional Court of Ohio state

Court of _________________________________________


Notice of and demand for Appeal of Order(s)/Judgement(s) of judge/magistrate of COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and or relief from judgement(s)/Order(s)

purported Case No. 91-DC-000792

GAIL BRAHIER, supposed plaintiff/accuser/respondent/appellee

verses

MAURICE BRAHIER, supposed accused/defendant/realtor/appellant

______________________________________________


Comes now, the supposed accused/defendant/realtor/appllant, Maurice Edward, Brahier, to issue Notice of, and demand for Appeal and or other relief from judgement/Order(s). And to bring such Appeal and or other relief, and in forma pauperous.


  • 1. Orders and or judgements which fail to provide or proceed under the Constitutional protections, Rights, Immunities, and privileges of parties before the Court can not withstand review and have, therefore, no basis in Law.


  • 2. Judgements/Orders procured by fraud or containing fraudulent activities stand as affronts to justice, Law, the Constitutional protections of the People, and the Constitutions. Fraud vitiates and voids all ORDERS, JUDGEMENTS, CONTRACTS, and other, ab initio. No individual may be held to or by fraudulent activity, and or other against them.


  • 3. (A) Judge(s) can not actively and knowingly fail to follow the Oath of Office they must take to achieve such office, and sworn to the People, or they are violating the Constitutions and have no basis and authority or immunity, and therefore are prosecutable for these crimes.


  • 4. The statutory Law which the judge(s) use(s) is suspect of foreign influence, corruption, and otherwise, and therefore is not Constitutionally based or allowed.


  • 5. The statutory Law may not be used against parties who are not subject to them. It may not be used to inhibit, destroy, or otherwise impair the Rights of the People.


  • 6. The Memorandum/Expose` submitted with this Demand/Appeal, sets forth further issues and support, and the Judge(s) and parties are directed to such. Since the Memorandum/Expose` consists of substantial pages it shall be always included in further activities, reviews and other.

  • Judicial Notice will be issued of this fact, and the contents of the Memorandum/Expose` and the Constitutions, it shall remain a permanent part of the records. Further, the records of the Courts both states and federal are substantial and substantive and fundamental, therefore they shall be brought before the Court for review. Order shall issue to bring such before this Court of Record in pursuit of justice and due process of Law.


  • 7. Maurice Edward, Brahier, finds himself in the position of forma pauperous. The issues presented are substantial, substantive, fundamental, and in violation of the Constitutions. The supposed Rules and or Statutes which claim to force individuals to submit Affidavits of poverty are a direct affront to individual privacy, protections, immunities and therefore have no use in this instance.

  • NOTICE: I state I am in this position, any challenge to such will be construed as a personal attack against me and justice. Therefore, the issues will proceed, pursuant to this statement without further activity concerning such. A mere showing of supposed money or other possessions does not show ability to afford to lose or use such to effect this relief.


  • 8. Magistrate Mullen struck important and key documents concerning Rights and protections from the record of the Court. These documents will be returned to the Records.


    • a. No judge/magistrate may strike objections to issues which: they created; or, against or to their activities.
    • b. No judge/magistrate may strike requests for Constitutional protections, Privileges, and Rights; and Notice of proper Service of Process, from courts of records.

    To do so is a deliberate violation of Oath, individual Rights, the Constitutions to which the parties served were directed, and outside his jurisdictional and or Constitutional authority. Courts of general jurisdiction must always establish jurisdictional basis and authority and Law; just as the supposed plaintiff or the instigators must establish jurisdiction and Law and basis within the record.

  • 9. The Constitutions are the supreme Law and contracts. Nothing exists with authority, power, and force, unless it or they follow such.

______________________________________

WHEREFORE, in the interest of justice, Rights, and other, the relief shall be granted without further Notice, and or failure. So it be, by public post, upon and within the Court of Records, this __________________ day of the ________________ month in the Nineteen-hundredth and ninety-ninth year, Anno Domini.

Maurice Edward of the Brahiers
signature block removed - A private individual of the People, in sovereignty.


CERTIFICATION OF MAILING/DELIVERY

The signatory below certifies that the parties have been sent or supplied with a copy of this document entitled OHIO RELIEF 3.doc and copy of the Memorandum/Expose` entitled Expose of Crimes-Ohio.doc by the following methods:

Gail Susan, Brahier or the party/Agency which purports to represent her via _________________________ delivery

Clerk of Court, Geauga County in Ohio state via ____________________

Done on this ________________________ day of the _______________ month in the ________________________________________ year, Anno Domini.

___________________________________________

Maurice Edward, Brahier

A private individual of the People in his sovereignty, and his Rights

____________________________________

____________________________________

____________________________________

in Ohio state


Google
Web peoplescounsel.orgfree.com
Search for
Get a Free Search Engine for Your Web Site
sitelevel.whatuseek image
© Copyright 2005. All rights reserved. Contact: M.Brahier

Free Web Hosting