In the Constitutional Court of Common Pleas of Geauga County in Ohio state, the Court of Record

Supposed case: 91-DC-000792

Notice of objection to Orders filed on October 21, 1999 by one Thomas J. Mullen in this colorable action, and cause.

Notice to the parties

_________________________________

Maurice Edward, Brahier, places these public and Court Notices of his objections to Thomas J. (unknown), Mullen's MAGISTRATE ORDERs filed on the twenty-first day of the tenth month of 1999, which have violated due process and Rights, and, Notice to the parties served.

As set forth upon the record:

1. Thomas J. Mullen has attempted to convert or has converted my Notices and other, presented solely under protection of my Rights, to supposed Motions before the Court. No such claim is available to him under the present matters. Each present specifically lists that is presented in pursuit of Rights. No Court may subvert this known protection of Rights by claiming Motions before the Court, supposedly waiving jurisdictional questions, and other. I waiver no questions of jurisdiction, Law, and or otherwise. I do not waiver any of my Rights.
2. By striking proper Service of Process upon the Court, Thomas J. Mullen has apparently and or deliberately violated known Rights and due process of Law. The Clerk should have properly noted this lawful Service of Process and properly filed the Documents thereon attached. This is no error which can be overlooked. She/he must have looked at the documents to even file such upon the record in purported case 91-DC-000792.
3. The supposed Rules, Statutes, or other, do not and can not overrule, diminish, or inhibit or destroy any of the Rights of the People. A thing invalid from the beginning can not be made valid by subsequent acts, supra.
4. All present Courts (State and Federal) realize Maurice Edward, Brahier, now, knows full well, how to, and when to, submit MOTIONS. That time has not been reached in the supposed matter before the Court. The instigators, judge/magistrate, and others must file their answers before further activity can occur. Thomas J. Mullen can not attempt to say he is proceeding on behalf of Maurice Edward, Brahier or proceeding under Law.
5. The striking of proper due process and conversion of inherent and substantive and substantial Rights to Motion, is abhorrent and in violation of constitutional Law.
6. NOTICE: since the instigators, magistrate, and other parties in opposition have had numerous days in which to file their answers to the questions properly placed before them, they are informed that further failures or refusals to comply with known constitutional Law and Rights will bring them as parties to misprision, and or fraud, and or collusion, and or misrepresentation, and or other. And if under Oath of Office, in contempt of this Oath and in perjury thereof.

Therefore, though Thomas J. Mullen was perhaps right in continuance of issue if he chose not to dismiss this colorable matter, and under the Courts own Motion, he was outside his authority to convert Rights to Motion, and to strike lawful process from the Court of record.

Wherefore, The Clerk will place this proper public Notice of objections and Notice to the parties, with cause, upon the public records. It may not be stricken. It may be used by Maurice Edward, Brahier, as information/evidence elsewhere.

So it be by public post upon and within the Court of record.

All previously served parties or their Agents have been sent a copy of this Notices of objection-Notice to parties.doc at their listed or known address via regular United States Mail on this twenty-fifth day of the tenth month of the Nineteen-hundredth and Ninety-ninth year, Anno Domini.

signature block removed - A private individual of the People in sovereignty

xxxxxxxxx

xxxxxx, Ohio xxxxxx