10-12-1999, Geauga County, Questions before personal entry, Questions of Law to establish jurisdiction and Law, proper court
This is the proper form and the proper questions to ask of
any court in America BEFORE entry, or response,
or pleading. All courts MUST answer questions of Law for
due process to be applied, and by Law and Right. These may be
asked at any stage of the proceedings. By using Notice
rather than Motion you reserve your RIGHT to challenge
jurisdiction and Law as this is IN LIMINE SITIS activity.
Anyone may ask these questions and have them answered,
regardless of any Union affiliation or otherwise [see other
cautionary statements elsewhere on this site for Union members].
A failure of the judge or magistrate to answer these questions is
grounds for Appeal, and, Complaint against the judge or
magistrate for monetary damage AND civil damage. All you are
doing is asking the court to define the law and jurisdiction it
is using, and what the judge or magistrate claims to be
using.
However, most courts and judges will NOT answer these questions because:
- most don't really know what Laws are being applied, nor do they care;
- most have no idea what jurisdiction they are using or should be using, nor do they care;
- those that do know, also know they can not use the courts and laws against you that they intend to use and allow to be used against you;
for if they answer these questions truthfully they can be
prosecuted for criminal acts because:
- UCC does not apply to you as an individual UNLESS you voluntarily agreed to its terms
- corporate by-laws (state and federal statutes) may NOT apply towards you, unless you fail to challenge their use against you.
If answered, a constitutional common law court can be
demanded, which will probally get the judge removed from the
bench and barred from practicing Law if it is supplied.
If answered, you will find help on how to defend yourself by reading the Expose` Volumes.
This was submitted [in various forms] to several courts, which either struck the document, which is unlawful; or ignored it. This version was to Chardon Common Pleas in Geauga County to a magistrate who struck it from court records.
Of course, by striking the QUESTIONS, this magistrate [magistrate Mullins] showed his distinct willingness to commit criminal acts, not only against the parties before the court, but ALL Ohio, ALL courts, and ALL America. {big round of applause, flags waving, God Bless America playing over the loud speaker}
NOTICE and questions/interrogatories to the judge/magistrate and Court or Tribunal under full disclosure and True Nature and Cause:
The recorder and clerk will make due notice upon the record of the numbered questions and corresponding answers without further request. And you will supply a verbatim copy of these specifics to me.
QUESTIONS
1. Is this a tribunal/Court of record?
Answer
2. Is this the Constitutional Court allowed therein?
Answer
3. What type and style of Court is this?
Answer
4. Answer these specific questions as applicable.
A. If tort or Equity:
1. What contract or statute does this court presume to proceed under or by?
Answer
2. How does this apply to me?
Answer
B. If Military:
1. What section of military code specifically applies to me and the case purported to be at bar?
Answer
2. How can Military Law and Code be applied to non-military personnel?
Answer
C. If Admiralty or Maritime:
1.What Law or contract does the tribunal/Court and judge or magistrate rely upon to continue?
Answer
2. How or why does the Court presume this applies to me?
Answer
3. Where does the Constitution state Admiralty applies?
Answer
D. If common law:
1. What or which purported set of common law does the Court continue under?
Answer
2. Is this International Common Law?
Answer
3. Is this Constitutional common Law?
Answer
4. Is this the common Law that existed and is required under the Constitution?
Answer
E. .If Statute Law:
1. Does the Tribunal claim that the Statutes replace or remove Constitutional common Law?
Answer
2. How exactly does Statute law take precedent over Constitutional Law?
Answer
3. Where do Statute Laws get their authority?
Answer
4. How are Statute Laws created?
Answer
5. Does the tribunal contend that Statutes are created by the Legislature?
Answer
6. I have demanded my Rights as stated in my declarations and Notices, as found in the Constitutions, does the Court or Tribunal and judge or magistrate intend to provide them and proceed pursuant to them?
Answer
The Court will attach additional pages as necessary, with headings and numbered and lettered indications, for complete and concise answer to these questions.
Questions presented to the Court or Tribunal prior to entry, by Maurice Edward, Brahier. Additional pages to be attached if necessary for full disclosure as required by Constitutions.
So it be, by public post, as demanded by the signatory below.
signatory block removed,
Maurice Edward, Brahier, sui juris, sui jure, a private individual of sovereignty, on this twelfth day of the tenth month at the tenth hour and thirty-eighth minute, in the Nineteen Hundredth and Ninety-ninth year, Anno Domini.
Attached to In Demand for Rights-Protections-Immunities.doc
Entry-Court-numbered questions and corresponding answers.doc
END
Serve this process to all parties, including the opposing party and their attorney/representative.
You must include a self addressed stamped envelope for the returned copy, as the matter has not been established under jurisdictional requirements yet, hence forma pauperous jurisdiction has not been established as well.
Again, a good understanding of the Law, local/State/Federal Rules, Rules of Evidence, and local procedural Rules all must be taken under consideration for this style of activity.
As is generally heard in the legal circle: only a fool has theirself as a client, which equates to only a fool represents themself. This page is not legal advise, but for informational purposes only.
SEE:Disclaimer Notice and Legal Notice