Peoples' Counsel Home
Contact Us
Ruffstuff's Blog
Peoples' Counsel Blog
Site Map
Expose` of Crimes Volume 1 11-09-99
Expose` Of Crimes Volume II 12-19-02
Expose` of Crimes Volume III 02-26-04
Expose` Of Crimes Volume IV
Expose` of Crimes Volume V 04-11-04
Expose` of Crimes Volume VI 04-23-04
Expose` of Crimes Volume VIII 02-25-04
5-03-CV-258R, the final federal case before judicial complaints and cases
12-27-04 Peoples Response to southern Ohio USDC refusals & corruption
01-05-05 DCUSA activities
01-29-05 Response to refusal to file
Response to defendant Ovington 02-09-05 ORDERS
04-27-05 defendant Rice ORDER Dismissing Demand for Grand Jury & Certification of Questions to The Supreme Court
Peoples' 05-26-05 Response to fraudulent Order
PDF of 6th Circuit attempt to assign request as Appeal
Response to 6th Circuit attempt to assign request as Appeal
Kentucky Supreme Court Case 98-SC-916-AO The People vs COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
1998 Kentucky attempt to prosecute for persisent offender with criminally obtained judgements
Ohio 1991 to present, courts, AGENCIES, and other
Senate Report 93-549 Termination of The National Emergency
sunset_mod.png Peoples' Counsel presents:
the "real world" of Law, Justice and government
A Peoples' Counsel Website
link to http://peoplescounsel.orgfree.com

Your layman's guide to the "real" world of Law, justice, and government.



Maurice Edward, Brahier

A private individual of the People in his sovereignty

In the constitutional Court of Common Pleas of Geauga County in Ohio State

Notice of and in demand for compliance with Rights and Law

Judge/Magistrate ____________________________

Supposed plaintiff GAIL BRAHIER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

supposed defendant MAURICE BRAHIER,

Defendant

Case No.: supposed No. 91-DC-000792

Questions/Interrogatories to be answered by the instigators, pursuant to U.S.A. Constitution Amendments 1; IV; V; VI; VII; VIII; IX; XI, and Article VI (para. 2) (and or others including Constitution of The State of Ohio known factors of Law) prior to continuance of the purported Matters before the Court and any possible defendant�s entry into and before the Court

No waiver to or of jurisdiction and Rights is applied, inferred, or otherwise

MARK THIS WELL

Comes now, the natural individual Maurice Edward, Brahier, of the People, and in his sovereignty, to demand answers from : the Court; the Judge/magistrate; the Plaintiff; Child Support Enforcement Division; and Geauga County Prosecutor Office and it's Agent(s)/representatives/ provocateurs, under his inherent and inalienable Rights to have these questions answered and to have full and complete disclosure of the true Nature and Cause of the purported action before the Court prior to and before further action/activity/proceedings may be had by any supposed plaintiff and or representative or Agent thereof.

The controlling constitutional maxims and mandates of Law (though I do not limit myself to or by these presents alone) are any accused inherent and inalienable Rights:

  • (A) to be informed of the true nature and cause, of Law, and any supposed lawful activities against their person, their property, their liberty, and other freedoms and protections and immunities,
  • (B) to be free: from unlawful and unconstitutional activities, such as selective and or malicious prosecutions, double jeopardy, fraud, collusion, misprision, misrepresentation and other;
  • (C) to have justice administered without sale, denial or delay;
  • (D) to have fair and impartial Courts, juries, judges and magistrates; (E) to be free from governmental intrusion into their private lives, and from subjugation;
  • (E) to be held only to and by constitutional Laws;
  • (F) to be free from destruction, mutilation, of evidence;
  • (G) and other known maxims and undeniable Rights of the People of the State and States united, all which must be supplied if the Courts, judges, and magistrates purport to be continuing under constitutional authority to proceed and under the Oaths of Office and to the People.

Maurice Edward, Brahier, does not waiver any of his Rights, jurisdictional questions, or any other constitutional matter or material facts or factors. He will properly respond to this purported action and will request subpoenas and other when these matters are properly, constitutionally, and lawfully attended to by full and complete disclosure.

Wherefore, the complete and full disclosure of answers to these questions, and proof thereof, and other matters will be provided prior to any further, or new, or additional activities occur, as is demanded by the Constitutions of the State and nation.

(see attached copies of the questions required to be answered under full and complete disclosure of the Nature and Cause of this purported matter before the Court and under other Rights, privileges, and immunities as known or addressed or implied)

So it be properly attended to by public post.

Dated this 10th day of October, 1999

signature block removed

Maurice Edward, Brahier

A private individual of the People in his sovereignty



Certification of Mailings/delivery

The undersigned signatory does certify he has effected delivery of this document In Demand for Constitutional Rights, Protections, and Immunities (consisting of 4 pages) with attached copies of questions/interrogatories to:

Gail Susan, (Davis) Brahier, 1371A Dana Drive in Oxford Ohio via priority mail;

GEAUGA COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE via hand delivery;

JOANNE MIHALACKI of Child Support Enforcement Division via hand delivery;

THOMAS J. MULLENS purported MAGISTRATE of GEAUAGA COUNTY;

Clerk of Court of Geauga County in Ohio state via hand delivery;

And elsewhere,

On this _____________ day of the tenth (10th) month in the Nineteen hundredth and Ninety-ninth year, Anno Domini

signature block removed - A private individual of the People in his sovereignty

xxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxx, Ohio xxxxxxx


Google
Web peoplescounsel.orgfree.com
Search for
Get a Free Search Engine for Your Web Site
sitelevel.whatuseek image
© Copyright 2005. All rights reserved. Contact: M.Brahier

Free Web Hosting