Peoples' Counsel Home
Contact Us
Ruffstuff's Blog
Peoples' Counsel Blog
Site Map
Expose` of Crimes Volume 1 11-09-99
Expose` Of Crimes Volume II 12-19-02
Expose` of Crimes Volume III 02-26-04
Expose` Of Crimes Volume IV
Expose` of Crimes Volume V 04-11-04
Expose` of Crimes Volume VI 04-23-04
Expose` of Crimes Volume VIII 02-25-04
5-03-CV-258R, the final federal case before judicial complaints and cases
12-27-04 Peoples Response to southern Ohio USDC refusals & corruption
01-05-05 DCUSA activities
01-29-05 Response to refusal to file
Response to defendant Ovington 02-09-05 ORDERS
04-27-05 defendant Rice ORDER Dismissing Demand for Grand Jury & Certification of Questions to The Supreme Court
Peoples' 05-26-05 Response to fraudulent Order
PDF of 6th Circuit attempt to assign request as Appeal
Response to 6th Circuit attempt to assign request as Appeal
Kentucky Supreme Court Case 98-SC-916-AO The People vs COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
1998 Kentucky attempt to prosecute for persisent offender with criminally obtained judgements
Ohio 1991 to present, courts, AGENCIES, and other
Senate Report 93-549 Termination of The National Emergency
sunset_mod.png Peoples' Counsel presents:
the "real world" of Law, Justice and government
A Peoples' Counsel Website
link to http://peoplescounsel.orgfree.com

Your layman's guide to the "real" world of Law, justice, and government.



Eleventh District Court of Appeals of Ohio state



GAIL BRAHIER (unknown),

Supposed Appellee,

vs.

MAURICE BRAHIER (unknown),

Supposed Appellant


)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: supposed case no. 2000-G-2269

In response to the continued unlawful practices perpetrated by this corrupt tribunal:
Notice of Objections;
Notice of fraud; Notice of deliberate Error;
Coerced compliance, attached Order/judgment

On the seventeenth (17th) day of the fourth (4th) month of the two thousandth (2000th) year Anno Domini, a document purported to be a lawful document from some IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVETH DISTRICT sent to an unknown named MAURICE E. BRAHIER was received at my address.

As this is not a proper name for one of the People of the United States of America when addressed by public servants or agency of government, I continue under objection to this deliberate misnomer/nom de guerre creation of government. Any further correspondence which does not address me, as is lawful and required from the Peoples� servants, will be refused for fraudulent documents. Further attempts to coerce or otherwise force this "person", "subject", OR "ENFRANCHIZED SLAVE" standing, will bring such parties as prosecutable for fraud, use of the United States mail commit fraud or other, and or other criminal and civil prosecution. All parties have been properly informed of this unlawful activity hereby.

Included within this supposed JUDGMENT ENTRY is the signature by one Judith A. (unknown) Christley. Apparently this woman is functioning in an administrative capacity in a supposed lawful Court of STATE OF OHIO corporation. It is entirely questionable whether this JUDGMENT ENTRY contains any lawful material, whatsoever, do to her foreign National status within this State. I have seen no Foreign Agent registration statement in record.

Moreover, this Judith A. Christley and the other members of this supposed Court, were parties brought previously for review before agencies of government for their active participation in unlawful and criminal activities and open collusion. Not uniquely the same parties are still members of court.

1. Ms. Christley claims on page one (1) that in the Courts findings, that no Judgment Entry was attached to the Notice of Appeal: "Since it does not appear that the Appellant has attached a copy of the judgment entry or entries�". However attached to the original documents (and as sent to the supposed parties in opposition) to which she has referred, was the judgment entry and or Order, which brought final cause for appeal of the unlawful and unconstitutional and criminal activities perpetrated against Maurice Edward, Brahier by the supposed lawful parties in matter.

Further, contained with the records of the Court, which this supposed lawful Court is to review, are the other unlawful judgment entries and Orders, a matter reviewable during the appeal.

Now, by her apparent statement, she suggest, in fact ORDERS, that this misnomer/nom de guerre MAURICE E. BRAHIER supply records of the lesser court prior to review of the records in proper review. Citing Loc.R. 5(E) as this reasoning, as if this supposed local rule can effect the Rights of Americans or the rules of due process, equal justice, and other inherent, substantive and substantial liberties of the People.

Not uniquely, this is the same Judith A. Christley who struck lawful and necessary documents and evidence from the original appeal of 91-DC-000792, to which objections were placed, to which other members actively conspired.

However, to defeat the supposed "sua sponte" dismissal of this appeal, I, on behalf of the People in general, and myself in particular, have attached the Order and or judgment which is part of the record of this appeal.

Wherefore, the appeal shall continue, however, it might be wise for this supposed Eleventh District Court of Appeals to submit this review to the Supreme Court of Ohio state, or some other Court, the parties within it, were and are in violation of the Constitutions; have actively conspired to commit treason, fraud, and other unlawful activities upon the People of the state and United States of America.

Further, it would appear that the judges of this court are, once again, posed to commit fraud, active collusion, and other crimes against the People of this state and the United States of America. I need not remind this court that its' responsibilities require it to review the entire record of 91-DC-000792 and appeals, which includes numerous fraudulent and criminal activities upon Maurice and his children, which this court must correct.

signature block removed - Dated this 17th day of April, 2000

A private sovereign and individual of the people at 2871 US 35E, West Alexandria 81, Ohio



CERTIFICATION OF DELIVERY

The signatory below affirms that he has sent this document (Response to - April 13-2000 Christley.doc and attached copy of Order/Judgment of Feb. 25 00, along with the supposed required DOCKETING STATEMENT and NOTICE OF APPEAL forms, as supplied to him, to:

GEAUGA COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE- City of Chardon in Ohio state;

Clerk of Courts of Geauga County- City of Chardon in Ohio state;

Gail Susan, Brahier- City of Oxford in Ohio state,

On this eighteenth (18th) day of the fourth (4th) month of the two-thousandth (2000th) year, Anno Domini, via regular United States messenger Service.

signature block removed



Google
Web peoplescounsel.orgfree.com
Search for
Get a Free Search Engine for Your Web Site
sitelevel.whatuseek image
© Copyright 2005. All rights reserved. Contact: M.Brahier

Free Web Hosting