Peoples' Counsel Home
Contact Us
Ruffstuff's Blog
Peoples' Counsel Blog
Site Map
Expose` of Crimes Volume 1 11-09-99
Expose` Of Crimes Volume II 12-19-02
Expose` of Crimes Volume III 02-26-04
Expose` Of Crimes Volume IV
Expose` of Crimes Volume V 04-11-04
Expose` of Crimes Volume VI 04-23-04
Expose` of Crimes Volume VIII 02-25-04
5-03-CV-258R, the final federal case before judicial complaints and cases
12-27-04 Peoples Response to southern Ohio USDC refusals & corruption
01-05-05 DCUSA activities
01-29-05 Response to refusal to file
Response to defendant Ovington 02-09-05 ORDERS
04-27-05 defendant Rice ORDER Dismissing Demand for Grand Jury & Certification of Questions to The Supreme Court
Peoples' 05-26-05 Response to fraudulent Order
PDF of 6th Circuit attempt to assign request as Appeal
Response to 6th Circuit attempt to assign request as Appeal
Kentucky Supreme Court Case 98-SC-916-AO The People vs COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
1998 Kentucky attempt to prosecute for persisent offender with criminally obtained judgements
Ohio 1991 to present, courts, AGENCIES, and other
Senate Report 93-549 Termination of The National Emergency
sunset_mod.png Peoples' Counsel presents:
the "real world" of Law, Justice and government
A Peoples' Counsel Website
link to http://peoplescounsel.orgfree.com

Your layman's guide to the "real" world of Law, justice, and government.



JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT OR DISABILITY

MAIL THIS FORM TO: CIRCUIT EXECUTIVE OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

503 U.S. POST OFFICE & COURTHOUSE

CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202

MARK ENVELOPE *JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT" OR JUDICIAL DISABILITY COMPLAINT."

DO NOT PUT THE NAME OF THE JUDGE OR MAGISTRATE ON THE ENVELOPE.

SEE RULE 2 FOR THE NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED.

1. Complainant's Name: Maurice Edward, Brahier

Address:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Daytime telephone: xxxxxxxxxxxx

2. Judge or Magistrate complained about:

Name: Thomas B. Russell; W. D. King, Edward H. Johnstone

Court: Western District of Kentucky - USDC

3. Does this complaint concern the behavior of the judge or magistrate in a particular lawsuit or lawsuits?

X Yes __ No

If 'yes' give the following information about each lawsuit

(use reverse side if there is more than one): see: supporting direction and cases document submitted

Court: Western District of Kentucky- USDC

Docket number: 5:03-CV-258-R & 5:96-CV-201-(P)R & 5:96-CV-281-(J)R & 5:95-CV-241-J & 5:94-CV-00035

Are (were) you a party or lawyer in the lawsuit?

X Party __ Lawyer __ Neither

If a party, give the following information:

Lawyer's Name: _________________________________________________________

Address: ______________________________________________________________

Telephone: ( ) _________________________

Docket number(s) of any appeals of above case(s) to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals:

See supporting document - 97-5567 & 97-5905 & ?

4. Have you filed any lawsuits against the judge or magistrate?

__ Yes __ No - qualified- formal complaint lodged in Western District-DCUS

I will decide on extent of action after and or pursuant to any outcome here and or there

If "yes" give the following information about each lawsuit

(use the reverse side if there is more than one):

Court: _____________________________________________


Docket Number: _____________________________________

Present status of suit: ____________________________

Your Lawyer's Name: ________________________________

Address: ___________________________________________

_____________________________________________________

Telephone:

Court to which any appeal has been taken: ___________

Docket number of the appeal: _________________________

Present status of the appeal: ________________________

5. On separate sheets of paper, not larger than the paper this form is printed on, describe the conduct or the evidence of disability that is the subject of this complaint. See rule 2(b) and rule 2(d). Do not use more than 5 pages (5 sides). Most complaints do not require that much.

***Document submitted - supporting direction and cases for Executive Complaint.doc

6. You should either

(1) check the first box below and sign this form in the presence of a notary public; or

(2) check the second box and sign the form. You do not need a notary public if

you check the second box.

__ I swear (affirm) that --

X I declare under penalty Of Perjury that --

(1) I have read rules 1 and 2 of the Rules of the Sixth Circuit Governing

Complaints of Judicial Misconduct or Disability, and

(2) The statements made in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

__________________________

(Signature)

Executed on _________________

(Date)

Sworn and subscribed

to before me ___________

(Date)

__________________________

(Notary Public)

My commission expires:


Maurice Edward, Brahier's supporting descriptive conduct regarding complaints

IN RE: Complaints of judicial misconduct occurring in Western District of Kentucky and this circuit

Action Number(s): ______________________________

Supporting materials

The complaints lodged deal with continuing course of conduct occurring in Western District of Kentucky and within this circuit.

We start with the most recent and work our way back through ten (10) years of actions in this circuit (thirteen years when including Ohio and Kentucky activities).

You will keep in mind this fact: all courts and other parties (state and federal) have been constantly advised of the facts, that Ohio Court of Common Pleas Orders and judgments were: fraudulent; unlawful; illegal; and criminally obtained. Evidence of such in Ohio records for, now, twelve (12) years.

Ohio, Kentucky and this circuit's courts were constantly apprised of such; requesting review of those records; all refusing to do so.

There appears to be a marked willingness displayed in these districts and this circuit to cover-up and further: unconstitutional violations of Rights, violations of due process, violations of law, and other.

  1. 5:03-CV-258-R: 11/20/03 - MOTION TO TRANFER state matter to federal court [DCUS]-recovery, restitution, damages, &c; RE: Ohio case-base matter of all federal cases, shown as fraudulently and criminally obtained in seventh month of 2003- all Ohio parties implicated & unable to handle recovery, &c; Motion for Civ. 60 relief concerning prior cases; other Notices - addressed.
  2. Notices sent to court - time elapsed; suggested orders - seize assets, relief from judgments, other - 01/14/04
  3. Notices (01/28/04) to court and Thomas B. Russell [USDC} after his intrusion (01/16/04)- including his lack of jurisdiction - Volumes I & II - IN EXPOSE� OF FRAUD, PERJURY, MISDEMEANORS, TREASONABLE ACTS, AND OTHER of supporting material submitted to the record.
  4. I submit additional Notices (03/03/04) to court concerning address; Volumes III & VIII - EXPOSE` submitted, and other
  5. On the thirteenth (13th) day of the third (3rd) month of two thousand and four (2004), I receive a MEMORANDUM and ORDER from USDC Thomas B. Russell dismissing case, stating various deliberately fraudulent reasons. (03/19/04) Notices filed: including request for proper forms to file for complaint against Thomas B. Russell, submitted to the clerk and court, no forms are received. Notices, also included: 'formal complaint' with reasons for such; and Volume IV - Expose` submitted. Five Volumes of Expose` now in record per that date. Separate Notice of and Questions of Law filed. No answers received to date of this document.
  6. Not included in the Notices is this factor properly bringing reviewable material (anchor) for review in this complaint:

a. In the memorandum supporting this supposed ORDER at page 1 under I. SUMMARY OF CLAIMS at line three (3) thereunder, we find this statement: "�over courts in our commonwealth." (Underline added) This appears to indicate what, and who, this judge believes himself to be: directly affiliated with Commonwealth of Kentucky and a judge thereof or in complicity therewith (see signature on page 5). This could be construed as collusion or other. It does show deliberate misconduct. I understand the applied 'corporatism' (co-operative federalism) being employed in America, however:

No federal or national court is part of, or included in, any state, or commonwealth, or territory (see: generally Expose` and Notices-jurisdiction and other, United States Code, etceteras). Wherefore, as defined: U.S. courts are essentially the 'guardians of'; 'guidance for'; and are erected to ensure, constitutional guarantees, national and or federal laws as applicable, and other, are supplied 'without fail' in this nation-subject to the various jurisdictions, and over parties subject to those various jurisdictions. Moreover, neither the new "constitution" - Constitution Of The United Nations Industrial Development Organization or Constitution For The Newstates Of The United States; or United Nations Charter; or Internal Revenue Service Charter, has bearing or worth in constitutional courts of this nation regarding the people of this nation, regardless of any treaty, other charter, or other contract, or other. We, as the People, defined our law, leaving you to define yours within our guidelines, limits, constrictions, and constraints. (See: state and national constitutional contracts; note specifically: these are contracts OVER you as obligors, not with you in partnership)

b. Moreover, this also indicates the allowance by the judge, of intrusion by 'commonwealth' into an issue, which they have no authority to presently participate in, and have a distinct interest in assuring the outcome thereof. This appears to be a dismissal to cover-up unlawful and or unconstitutional activities. This also appears to indicate his willingness to refuse to provide his duties and responsibilities, irrespective of his jurisdiction, and or his office.


This brings to 'light' and with 'renewed vigor' all prior activities occurring in these districts and circuit over the preceding ten- (10) years, which I partially address hereunder. Moreover, this displays a continuing 'train of circumstances' [SEE: EXPOSE`} by various members in this circuit, and elsewhere.

As this does include matters extending over ten years [thirteen total years within this circuit], I will list a portion of the issues, without lengthy discussion, due to constrictions imposed by the applicable rules. Therefore, it is obligatory upon the reviewers to investigate the various records for other such activities. The cases below, submitted while domiciled in Kentucky. I remind you I am a national Citizen, not an U.S. citizen of the fourteenth (14th) Amendment, nor am I a government employee.

  1. 5:96-CV-201-(P)-R: Complaint filed against Commonwealth parties and others for violations of constitutional Rights, law, due process, and other, submitted while falsely imprisoned; Records of commonwealth requested reviewed; subpoena request-ignored Docket-11; no defendant responds on record; reviewing judge-Thomas B. Russell-1/28/97 case dismissed pursuant 28 USC 1915; Motion for relief-denied; motion for Writ SCUSA- denied; certificate of appeal- denied; appeal filed 97-5567-dismissed/denied

This case brought these facts: that these individuals knowingly and willfully refused to:

  1. provide constitutional protections and rights;
  2. conspired to violate state and federal law;
  3. proceed properly under law; and
  4. other as addressed, pursuant cases handled in the commonwealth.
  5. SEE: Motions for: Civ R. 57, 58 59, 60 or other Relief Civ. R 52 statement Request for hearing: Notice: Jury Demand endorced(sp) hereon see specifically lines 7-9 page 1 SEE ALSO: Brief Memorandum in support of relief docket-17
  6. Note: I was ORDERED to supply fees AFTER it was shown there was no money available
  1. 5:96-CV-281-(J)R: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ordered split from 5:96-CV-201)while falsely imprisoned in commonwealth- Records of both states, and federal cases requested for review- denied; request for subpoenas-denied><ignored; Commonwealth responds on record; Reviewing magistrate W. D. King; judge-Thomas B. Russell- denied -06/27/97; appeal filed 97-5905

This case brought these facts:

  1. that the state court had deliberately misinformed the jury on law;
  2. I had been unlawfully imprisoned due to Ohio's false certification of unlawful judgments and orders, and the perjuries in affidavit used in the commonwealth courts;
  3. other matters as addressed therein.
  4. Note Objections to Order and Magistrates Report: and or Appeal; Briefed Hereon Request for relief docket-14
  5. Note Objection to Order of June 25, 1997, Demand for new trial and or other relief: Notice: Civ. 60, 59, 52, 62 : Appeal docket-?(16)
  1. 5:95-CV-241-J: 08/28/95-Complaint and Motion to Transfer case indicating activities perpetrated by various state and federal agents and or individuals for collusion/other; jury demand; no party responds on record; Leslie Furches, defendant, apparently submits something off record-I receive no document(note pro se listing- Appeal docketing sheet); reviewing judge Edward H. Johnstone; dismissed 02/07/96; Motion for relief-denied; IFP for appeal- denied; Appeal filed 96-5313 while unlawfully incarcerated- dismissed-lack of filing fees

This case, brought because of:

  1. the false certification of Ohio records and perjuries in affidavit;
  2. Kentucky defendants willingness to ignore requested review of Ohio records or to obtain them;
  3. denial of due process;
  4. other.
  5. NOTE: STATEMENT OF ERRORS and MOTION FOR RELIEF; docket-10
  1. 5:94-CV-00035: Complaint against Ohio individuals for violations of: constitutional Rights (state and national); due process; state and federal laws; Acts of Congress; obstruction of justice, civil rules, other; no defendant responds on record; reviewing judge Edward H. Johnstone; dismissed; other matters displayed on record

This case brought numerous Ohio individuals before the court, for:

  1. collusion,
  2. conspiracy,
  3. failures to provide duties and responsibilities of office/official capacity,
  4. perjury,
  5. obstruction of justice,
  6. false statements of law and right,
  7. and other as addressed therein.

This dismissed, base and pivotal case, laid the ground work for 10 more years of:

  1. unlawful activities;
  2. frauds;
  3. collusion;
  4. false arrests and imprisonments;
  5. and other; and
  6. failures to provide duties and responsibilities, as is displayed in Ohio, Kentucky and United States records.
  7. Which, of course, caused me harm and injury, disablement, loss of businesses, and otherwise completely destroyed my life.

Not only affecting actions in the courts, but congress, Office of the President, Justice Department, Attorney General Offices, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Marshal Service, and elsewhere.

We, therefore, see that I have properly addressed numerous violations of:

  1. state and United States law;
  2. constitutional Rights/provisions/immunities/protections;
  3. court rules;
  4. civil rules;
  5. judicial conduct;
  6. parties failing to provide official responsibilities/duties;
  7. ethical requirements,
  8. and volumous other, within the districts, and this circuit of responsibility.

These occurrences are and were tantamount to criminal activities, and appear organized in nature, but most certainly, are misconduct in its most intrusive and abusive form.

Apparently, there is no one associated directly or indirectly with these cases, which has provided their duties and responsibilities of office and or official capacity. These duties, responsibilities, and ethics appear outweighed and or overruled by some hidden or not so hidden private motives or agendas. I have yet to receive law and justice in the states, national, or federal, judicial system.

Therefore, it appears this Sixth Circuit has failed to provide proper guidance to the lesser courts, judges, attorneys, lawyers, etceteras; and governments and the offices and officers thereof, state and federal, or none of this would have occurred, or would have ended some ten years ago (regarding these matters), or any time during those ten years after being brought to the attention of the circuit, and elsewhere.

Appearances are thus: you have failed and defiled this nation; or, been an instrument thereof, based upon the materials available, of which I have presented only a portion of, for over seventy years. Evidence, circumstantial or hard, appears to exist into the 1800s era.

You shall consider this as complaints filed in, and against, the parties specifically addressed; and generally as admonishment(s) against this circuit, and any, and all, parties responsible for maintaining the integrity thereof, and the integrity of this nation.

These presents are sufficient to bring review. Perhaps it would be advisable to have an independent inquiry, or some other method used. If so, please advise me of how you wish or intend to continue, as I am one of the People of The United States of America in counsel.

I am not, however, a 'licensed', 'practicing', 'appointed'; 'elected' or 'certified', or otherwise legally created or 'benefited' or 'specially privileged': counsel; lawyer; attorney; esquire; agent and or member of "The Bar" or of any 'Bar'; agent and or member of any judiciary; and or 'office', and or part of, party to, member of, or associated with, any: organization; affiliation; assemblage; or otherwise, save, as progeny of and one of the People.

I remind you, these are and will remain open and public records, of sufficient and distinct import to the people of this nation, and perhaps the world.

So stated this Friday, April 02, of 2004 by the signatory below.

signature block removed

xxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxx Ohio

Postal Area xxxxxx

(937) xxxxxxxxx Ext. 9


Six copies provided which appears to be sufficient by rules; others may be copied from this document as required, as it would be untoward to expect me to produce unknown hundreds or potentially hundreds of thousands of copies of this document to all parties of this circuit, affected generally

The Expose` Volumes referenced, I have included on CD-ROM- 1 CD-ROM. Presented on cover/first page:

In the constitutional Courts of record, AND To The People's Grand and petite Juries and before the People

Maurice Edward, Brahier's Notices and Advisement - JURIS ET DE JURE

No waiver of Rights included, extended, or otherwise, herein or hereon

Introduced solely in protection of Rights and Constitutions, and the responsibilities and duties therein defined and mandated


IN EXPOSE` OF FRAUD, PERJURY, MISDEMEANORS, TREASONABLE ACTS, AND OTHER

BRIEFED ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE


Google
Web peoplescounsel.orgfree.com
Search for
Get a Free Search Engine for Your Web Site
sitelevel.whatuseek image
© Copyright 2005. All rights reserved. Contact: M.Brahier

Free Web Hosting