FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN KENTUCKY DIVISION
| MAURICE EDWARD, BRAHIER,
Plaintiff, vs. Robert Taft, et al, Defendants |
Case No.: CASE: 5:03-CV-258-R
Notice to clerks and judge-Copy of Application form sent to Gail S. Brahier; Notice of inclusion of CDROM containing Volumes I & II of Expose` |
The supposed judge has issued order that I, Maurice Edward, Brahier, must supply the court with application to proceed without pre-payment of fees and or costs (forma pauperous) which I have returned with my portion filled out as is required. However, the application includes a familial aspect concerning spousal assets.
Gail S. Brahier, (the party whom committed the original criminal activities in Ohio's courts and Kentucky's, and in the states) has proceeded as if she was untouchable, due to the harboring, aiding and abetting she received by her co-conspirators in Ohio, the other defendants in Ohio.
As we were ordered to separate, under constant threat of my incarceration, I, therefore, have no idea what her income is, everything she owns, her credit or other things. I do know she now owns a home (making payments I assume) and does own a vehicle.
Moreover, as we are, now, still, by law (though never lawfully divorced) married, of course, I will, due to these deliberate criminal activities perpetrated against myself and the children, and her blatant willingness to destroy me, divorce her in the future. But that is at a latter date.
I therefore, can not, without order by this court, force her to submit her statements on the application. I have sent a copy to her, along with this Notice, which is all I can do, as I am sure after these twelve years of abuse by her and her fellow conspirators she would be able to convince someone in Ohio that I have threatened her, or abused her, or otherwise. She has no problem with having me falsely incarcerated due to her fraud and or false statements. Moreover, Ohio seems quite willing to do so, while protecting her. So I will continue to stay away from her, obviously.
Therefore, this court will have to accept my application as I have sent it. Or, it will have to order her to finish her portion. Noting on the record, of course, I have no access to her assets at this time. Unless the court wishes to order her to pre-pay costs and fees. Which would, in essence, be paying for her own prosecution.
NOTICE REGARDING CDROM
See first, other Notices submitted with these Notices
I have sent a cdrom with these documents submitted pursuant the case.
The court shall take notice that it is supplied to end the apparent mis-conception of this court that it will continue in its present state. Moreover, it is presented to inform those whom might think to commit some form of criminal activities against me or violations of my rights, that I will know it is occurring, and will take action against any whom should attempt such, up to and including criminal prosecution, be it in this country or before the world.
Volume I is a matter of record in Ohio, Volume II was submitted to Ohio and apparently stolen without being entered into official record, but they are also in United States records, such as: Supreme Court of The United States of America. Also notice, I am well aware of the breach of contract this court and its' supposed officers are in, and their apparent participation in unlawful activities. These Volumes can be found in the \Submitted Expose Volumes folder on the disk, in either html or doc format.
The court will take due notice of those facts.
Dated this 24th day of January, 2004
signature block removed
copy to Gail S. Brahier
xxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxx
C:\My Documents\Courts and BOC\Federal District Courts\Kentucky\NOTICE of application-copyto Gail-Notice of cdrom.doc