WESTERN KENTUCKY DIVISION
| MAURICE EDWARD,
BRAHIER,
Plaintiff, vs. (fill in Ohio, "Attorney General" name); (fill in Ohio-"Supreme Court" names); Robert Taft; (add first name Baldwell); Betty D. Montgomery; Dennis Ibold; Richard P. Zeigler; Robert Umholtz; Thomas J. Mullen; Forrest W. Burt; Robert A. Nader; Judith A. Christley; Darya Jeffreys Klammer; Paul D. Henry-Preble County, Ohio; Hans R. Veit; Robert Inderlied; Elaine Tassey; Anita L. Comella; Stella Candella; Carl Miller; Kentucky- Micheal D. Ward; Dennis R. Foust; David C. Buckingham; Leslie Furches; others as addressed during pendency and or found in mailings/ certifications and state and federal records, Defendants |
Case No.:
MOTION TO TRANSFER STATE ACTION TO FEDERAL COURT RE: REQUEST FOR RESTITUTION, DAMAGES, recovery of cost and fees CONCERNING TWELVE (12) YEARS OF UNLAWFUL, ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND CRIMINAL ACTS AND ACTIVITIES PERPETRATED BY THE DEFENDANTS IN APPARENT CONSPIRACY AND OR OTHERWISE MOTION FOR CIVIL RULE 60 RELIEF FROM APPARENT FRAUD (intrinsic and or extrinsic) AND OR FAILURE OF FULL and PROPER CONSIDERATION(S) PURSUANT MATTERS ADDRESSED IN THIS DISTRICT COURT, and or as addressed under 60 B: 3, 4, 5, 6 NOTICE pursuant transfer for restitution, damages, recovery of cost and fees and relief from federal judgments/orders: the defendants are estopped from submitting further Motions, briefs, and or other, as they were afforded such in the various Actions and or cases |
Comes Maurice Edward, Brahier to submit Motion To Transfer State Action to federal court and NOTICE OF INTENT to file federal complaints against the defendants in their individual capacity for active and open participation in apparent organized fraud and other criminal acts and activities perpetrated during the years 1991 through 2003. This court was supplied with prior complaints, and other matters brought to bar pursuant these unlawful, illegal and otherwise abhorrent and deviant acts and measures. The court must re-think it's standing, as these are and were viable matters and issues, apparently mishandled and or misstated and/or misconstrued by this court and or its personnel in it's various judgments and or orders.
Jurisdiction comes to this court through prior diversity and other matters concerning Maurice Edward, Brahier, (handled by this court), constitutional questions, federal violations of law, "court of first contact", and other, such as responsibility of this court to protect America's legal system from fraud and other criminal Acts and activities (see ethics, Code of Judicial Conduct, duties and responsibilities, Oaths of Office, and other of like nature) pursuant:
Ohio 91DC000792 and the resultant:
OHIO Appeals concerning the above case: 92-G-1705; 93-G-1825, 2000-G-2269;
Ohio Disciplinary Counsel records of Supreme Court of Ohio: 1121; 1121J, 94-1688J; other;
Federal District Court Western Kentucky Division cases: 5:94-CV-00035; 5:95-CV-201R; 5:95-CV-241J; 5:96-CV-281(P)R; 97-5567 6th App; others, other records (States and federal;
And the Kentucky resultant cases:
96-CR-00050; 96-5313;98-M-00668; 98-CR-00120; 98-SC-916-OA.
No party may claim immunity when engaged in unlawful, illegal and or criminal activities.
MOTION TO TRANFER STATE ACTION TO FEDERAL COURT
A prior supposed action in Ohio; GAIL S. BRAHIER verses MAURICE E. BRAHIER was founded in and by unlawful and illegal activity. This is now a matter finalized in a court of these United States of America. For twelve (12) years the defendants have stacked and compounded their own unlawful and illegal activities upon the originals, adding their own apparent conspiracy, willfulness to commit fraud and other crimes and violations of Rights.
NOTICE, in fact, these were certified as lawful to another state.
Moreover, these were done without the jurisdiction to do so, now, also, a matter res judicata. Damages and other relief were requested in the state court for these 12 or so years of unlawful, illegal and criminal acts against Maurice Edward, Brahier.
The action should be transferred due to these facts and or factors:
The state court, in which this request for damages resides, is the court, which actively and openly furthered and or participated, in unlawful and illegal activities for twelve (12) or so years.
That the Geauga County Court of Common Pleas, Ohio, does not contain any judge whom has not knowingly participated, in some form, in these unlawful and illegal activities.
Ohio's state appellate court (Eleventh District) also knowingly participated in these unlawful and illegal activities.
The Supreme Court of Ohio also participated by: A. refusing to review this unlawful and illegal activity, even after personal contact with its representative. B. its disciplinary counsel's failure to properly investigate and pursue violators of the law, ethics and other. C. Hand picking the original judges to sit in the first appeal. Moreover, D. refusing the actions presented to it in pursuit of justice and rights over the course of these twelve years.
It is patently clear to Maurice Edward, Brahier, after over twelve years of contact with Ohio and it's various Agencies and Officials and officers (NOTICE specifically the parties contacted in the CERTIFICATIONS OF MAILINGS/DELIVERY); that none of those individuals, appear to provide their duties and responsibilities to the people of the state, much less the United States of America. Working, instead, to subvert and destroy the government, and law and legal system of America, for evident personal and or private gain. Violating the law and whomsoever's Rights get in their way.
Additionally, it appears clear to Maurice Edward, Brahier, that Ohio's courts would not adequately supply restitution and damages. Nor would Ohio pursue proper prosecution of these defendants, as it has apparently failed to do so, to date.
WHEREFORE, this motion to transfer should and must be granted, the restitution, damages, and recovery of costs and fees, attended to poste-haste, in the interest of and pursuit of law and justice in America.
The records of Ohio, Kentucky, and this court shall (under the Courts own Motion or Orders) be reviewed for each instance of fraud, collusion, conspiracy, misfeasance, malfeasance, nonfeasance, false statements of law and or right, false arrests and imprisonments, and any other, perpetrated against Maurice Edward, Brahier.
Federal guidelines (restitution, damages, other) indicate each instance shall be found (under the Courts own Motions or Orders) and valued, and the individuals responsible, held legally and financially liable for each instance and or occurrence.
MOTION TO RELIEVE Maurice Edward, Brahier under Civ. R. 60
Maurice Edward, Brahier requests this court relieve him from the judgments produced by this court, which contain fraud intrinsic and or extrinsic and or failure to properly consider issues and matters presented to this court, based upon void, and or unlawful and or illegal, and or unconstitutional state judgments.
Relevance relates directly to the use of the Anti-terrorism Act against an innocent individual being subjected to unlawful and or illegal activities, and other failures by this court to uphold the basic and essential principals of law and justice, and Rights in these United States of America.
Particularly, as this court was supplied with complaint of these various unlawful, illegal, and criminal issues and matters against these parties or others of responsibility some 10 or so years ago and at other times during the course of years, and failed to properly handle and consider the matters before the court. Claiming, in fact, in the original action, instead, that it was supposedly done to involve the court in domestic matters, and was "couched in constitutional terms".
Moreover, due to this reprehensible apathy or otherwise by this court, and failure of proper considerations, Maurice Edward, Brahier was subjected to false arrests and imprisonments, physical harm, loss of businesses, further unlawful and illegal prosecutions, and further frauds, and other unlawful and illegal activities perpetrated against him.
Furthermore, the laws, rules, codes and other of two (2) or more states and The United States of America were violated. Additionally, those unlawful, illegal and unjust state orders/judgments, falsely certified as lawful, legal and just to other states, businesses, and elsewhere.
One would hate to think or find that this court and or United States Courts and/or the federal government is or are as corrupt as the Ohio courts and government; or were actively working to destroy America and its law and justice, and the rule of law. That might require an action in the World Court, and expose all involved to world condemnation or other.
WHERERFORE, the court shall relieve me (Maurice Edward, Brahier) from these judgments and or orders, which stand outside the rules, laws, substance and fabric, and basic fundamental principals of justice in America.
Moreover, the court must now grant the relief; and restitution, damages, and costs and fees that were requested thereon, in addition to any other relief I have requested, such as the new damages which must be valued by review of the records.
Dated this Thursday, November 16, 2003
signature block removed |
CERTIFICATION OF MAILING/DELIVERY
The signatory below certifies that this document of Maurice Edward, Brahier records C:\My Documents\Courts and BOC\Federal District Courts\Kentucky\Transfer-damages- restitution-CivR 60-Notices.doc has been sent via ?regular ?certified ?tracked United States Mail this ______________ day of _____________________________ of 2003 to:
____________________________________
____________________________________
____________________________________
____________________________________
________________________________
Name:
Address:
Phone:
Association/Agency/authority:
Separate NOTICE/Certification by Maurice Edward, Brahier
Proper Notice of this submission was sent this same day to the Clerks of Court as is displayed upon the face of the ENTRY NOTICE.
signature block removed
c/o xxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxx
Postal area xxxxxxx
Exhibit sent with Motions, Notices, and Requests - 2001 contact with U.S. Attorney, DOJ
Right click and zoom to read
US
Attorney page 1
US
Attorney page 2
US
Attorney page 3