Peoples' Counsel presents: Home Page
Contact Us
Ruffstuff Blog
Peoples Counsel Blog
Ruffstuff's Ruffstuff site map
Expose Volume 1
Expose Volume II
Expose Volume III
Expose Volume IV
Expose Volume V
Expose Volume VI
Expose Volume VIII
sunset_mod.png

People's Counsel presents: the "real" world of Law, Justice, and government
A People's Counsel Website
link to http://peoplescounsel.orgfree.com

5-03-CV-258R, the final federal case before judicial complaints and cases
12-27-04 Peoples Response to southern Ohio USDC refusals & corruption
Response to defendant Ovington 02-09-05 ORDERS
04-27-05 defendant Rice ORDER Dismissing Demand for Grand Jury & Certification of Questions to The Supreme Court
Kentucky Supreme Court Case 98-SC-916-AO The People vs COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
1998 Kentucky attempt to prosecute for persisent offender with criminally obtained judgements
Ohio 1991 to present, courts, AGENCIES, and other
Senate Report 93-549 Termination of The National Emergency
DMCA agent and other designations, and Notices regarding Peoples' Counsel web site


                          IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 
 
                             GEAUGA COUNTY, OHIO 
 
MAURICE E. BRAHIER                            :CASE NO. 91DC000792 
 
                  DEFENDANT                   : JUDGE HANS R. VEIT 
      vs.                                  
GAIL S. BRAHIER                               : AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF 
                                                MOTION FOR TEMPORARY 
                  PLAINTIFF                   : RESTRAINING ORDER 
State of Ohio 
             ss 
County of Geauga 
 
    MAURICE E. BRAHIER, first duly sworn, according to law, deposes and 
 
states that: 
 
      1. He is the defendant in the within action. 
 
      2. He and the plaintiff were married on or about April 26, 1982, in 
 
Richmond, Kentucky. 
 
      3. He and the plaintiff are the natural parents of two (2) minor 
 
children, daughter {name removed by request}, born November 24, 1985, and son[name removed] 
 
Brahier, born December 14, 1987. 
 
      4. Plaintiff has recently made statements to this affiant indicating 
 
that she intends to take the two (2) minor children out of the State of 
 
Ohio. 
 
      5. Affiant states that pursuant to his restraining order she shall 
 
so be restrained. 
 
      6. Affiant states that he has reason to believe and does believe, 
 
that unless restrained, the plaintiff may remove the children as she has 
 
so stated. 
 
      7. Affiant further states that he has no adequate remedy at law. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
       FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. 
 
                                          ______________________________ 
                                          MAURICE E. BRAHIER 
 
     SWORN TO BEFORE ME AND SUBSCIBED IN MY PRESENCE THIS _____ DAY OF 
 ______________________, 1991. 
 
                                          _______________________________ 
                                          NOTARY PUBLIC 
PREPARED BY: 
MAURICE E. BRAHIER 
11654 Claridon-Troy Rd. 
Chardon, Ohio  44024 
(216) 635-0361 
 
 
next page please if applicable                  page no. 2


Google
Search for
Get a Free Search Engine for Your Web Site
sitelevel.whatuseek image
© Copyright 2005. All rights reserved. Contact: M.Brahier

Free Web Hosting