IN Circuit Court (appellate court) for The United States of America

6^th circuit

IN district court of The United States of America

On 06-24-05, Peoples' Counsel received a document issued under guise of supposed lawful activity, claiming the People have requested an Appeal [05-3772]. There are no submissions to any court which show-requested matter under Appeal, particularly to the Sixth Circuit, as it is documented upon the record, of its' apparent participation in this criminal activity.

There is, however, a demand under the Peoples' authority for an ORDER based upon fact rather than what appears to be a deliberate fraudulent ORDER created by co-conspirators to the syndicated racketeering occurring in the 6^th Circuit, under its direction and protection.

The People now direct the clerk and court to these facts:

1. At sentence two (par. 1) of body (06-23-05 document signed by a Michelle M. Davis, some supposed Case Manager in UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS) find:

"Please review the caption for accuracy; it and the case number must appear on all filings."

Addressed to wit: Improperly, willfully, and deliberately mis-captioned in DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES by clerks, and park commissioners masquerading as judges of official capacity, who created three (or more) supposed Plaintiff parties out of thin air to cover-up the active participation of these named and listed defendants in apparent syndicated racketeering and other organized criminal activities.

In fact: a supposed lawful federal judge, a Mr. Walter H. Rice, created an entirely new set of plaintiffs, apparently out of his own wants and desires, not based upon the materials he supposedly reviewed.

Moreover, assigning Peoples' counsel as plaintiff, in blatant display of his apparent hostile attitude towards counsel of parties before the courts presenting their respective positions. It appears reasonable to state that he has no respect for those NOT a member of his profession, or his bar.

The proper captioning of all activities is, as modified, and will remain, pending additional defendant inclusions:

The People and their states of The United States of America

Plaintiffs

Against

James Bonini;
Thomas M. Ross;
Sharon L. Ovington;
Michael R. Merz;
James A. Higgins;
Danny J. Boggs;
Thomas B. Russell;
Edward H. Johnstone;
W. D. King;
All Sixth circuit parties participating in supposed review of the Complaint before the 6^th Circuit Judicial Counsel

Defendants

Per (01-10-05) 01-13-05 submission:

"Present counsel, in and of the People, has received documents from USCA, claiming to be a lawful reviewing council, which has reviewed organized criminal activities occurring within the circuit, claimed as the 6^th. Pursuant that supposed lawfully accomplished review, those individuals involved affirm the dismissal of complaint filed against their members for obstructing justice and otherwise covering-up violations of law, rules, and other, of United States, and, The United States of America.

Being purported certified and sanctioned judges of United States, it appears, as previously presented in the submission to noted parties (12-03-04 and 12-23-04 submissions and receipt copies and "fax tracks"): these individuals have willfully, knowingly, and

C:\My Documents\Courts and BOC\Federal District Courts\Ohio\DCUSA-CtCUSA-SCUSA- Notices-additional parties-other Notices.doc

Page 2 of 37

with conscious knowledge of their unlawful acts, furthered this criminal activity within the circuit and The United States of America as defined by the constitution. Wherefore, those individuals are hereafter included within this matter as defendants. A list of such individuals shall be placed upon the record by the circuit executive.

Required by law to have found misconduct and instituted criminal investigations, these individuals have, instead, acted in concert, complicity and in conspiracy with others; to defeat and destroy the law, rules, and other of The United States of America. Whereby, inflicting irreparable harm and damage upon and against this nation, the states, and the People."

Fax tracks for above:

"Executive, Office of The Circu","Executive, Office of The Circu","","+1 (513) 564-7210","Your Notice and document as sent to DCUSA & SCUSA","faxsent","","","38","38","0","Fine","okevent","513 564 7210","24 min 48 sec","14400","0","Off","07:23:16 PM","01/13/05","","",""

Partial email tracks for submission:

>From: "ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov" <>
>To: "<"m_brahier@hotmail.com" m_brahier@hotmail.com>
>Subject: RE: Notification, Notices, pdf of DCUSA-CtCUSA-SCUSA submission
>attached, includes Peoples' evidence 11P-27P
>Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:58:17 -0500 (EST)
>
>Thank you for contacting the Department of Justice. This is an automatic
>acknowledgement that your e-mail was received. It will be reviewed in the
>order it was received

_______________

>From: System Administrator <"postmaster@turner.com" >
>To:"m_brahier@hotmail.com"
>Subject: Undeliverable: FW: Notification, Notices, pdf of
>DCUSA-CtCUSA-SCUSA submission attached, includes Peoples' evidence 11P-27P
>Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:58:55 -0500
>
>Your message
>
> To: "mailto:crossfire@cnn.com" class="c4">crossfire@cnn.com; "public@nytimes.com" class="c4">public@nytimes.com; letters@tnr.com;
>loudobbstonight@turner.com; loudobbs@cnn.com; wolfblitzer@cnn.com wolfblitzer@cnn.com;
>news-tip@nytimes.com; contact@afp.com
> Subject: FW: Notification, Notices, pdf of DCUSA-CtCUSA-SCUSA submission
>attached, includes Peoples' evidence 11P-27P
> Sent: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:56:13 -0500
>
>did not reach the following recipient(s):
>
>WOLFBLITZER@CNN.COM on Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:58:40 -0500
> The recipient name is not recognized
> The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a=
>;p=twi;l=CNNCMX060501132058ZZ4CNTDP
> MSEXCH:IMS:TWI:TBSCENTRAL:CNNCMX06 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient

WHEREFORE, all documents will be modified to match the actual parties as so stated upon the official records. All further attempts to place the Peoples' Counsel, as supposed plaintiff will find such parties added as defendants to this matter, as previously NOTICED.

2. At paragraph two (2) of the supposed document referencing an Appeal:

"Before your appeal can proceed any further, the district court is required to certify whether your appeal is taken in good faith under ' 1915(a)(3). (blah blah)"

Here we find that named conspirators or other active participants believe that they will, once again, force an issue; in which they are named or indicated defendants; before themselves; for review; of their own active participation in syndicated racketeering and other organized crimes. Moreover, should they find "bad faith" then the matter will not continue.

Moreover, as the issues were brought under the inherent, inalienable rights of the People of America to review and potentially clean corruption from their nation (via Special and/or Grand Jury, and, indictments) under their retained authority of Amendments 9 and 10; these real or apparent criminals, will "walk away" having been determined BY THEM that the matter may not continue due to "lack of merit", or, "bad faith", or, a failure to file a document which applies to citizens, persons, and other legal creations. Yet has no worth, weight, or authority, when weighed against the Peoples' authority in their nation, and the depth of this apparent organized criminal activity.

3. At paragraph three (3) this purported case manager show her apparent arrogance, or makes an unqualified assumption, in which she states:

"Procedures and filing requirements in the court of appeals can be complicated or confusing. It is very important to read the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure,..."

Here is a party that has associated with a court for so long, and with fellow officers of the court / attorneys; that she indicates (without saying such) that:

"Here's another idiot coming to MY court, that I'm going to have to lead by the nose, .. maybe I'll do the same as the others, which have mishandled these 14 years of cases in evidence upon the record... I'll have to write recommendations for a case that would affect my CAREER and retirement..."

Peoples' counsel suggests, instead, this "manager" write the opposing brief(s) to the seven Volumes of Expose' of Crimes now in the record, if she feels so competent. Counsel does have several more Volumes in mind.

As for the Rules of Court or Rules of Procedure: when it is the judicial system, which is under review by the People, they do not matter, because those are also under review.

Be these issues tried by the courts, or by the People, there is now less than four years left before this world which you think you have created and control, crashes around your ears, that's if I had to predict.. particularly after this last "nail in the coffin" of this new "eminent domain" Supreme Court Ruling.. this one will rise up to haunt you..

CONCLUSION

The matter before the district court is the issuance of an ORDER based upon fact rather than fallacy, the district court will make such correction, so the matter might proceed according to Law, Rule, and Right.

RELIEF

Should the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT refuse to correct it's own unlawful, illegal activities, the circuit court will issue mandate as required to correct this unlawful, illegal, and apparent criminal activity in which UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT is engaged. Moreover, it will compel the lesser court to abide by its responsibilities to the people by instituting the Special Grand Jury to review apparent syndicated racketeering and other organized crimes occurring in the circuit, and elsewhere.

Whereafter, the People will determine which avenue in which to proceed.

So it be by public post this 11^th day July of 2005.

signature block removed

Peoples' counsel

Flesch Reading ease 37.9

Flesch-Kincaid Grade level 12.0

Copies via various methods to:
President [email];
Vice-president [email];
Solicitor General [email via DOJ;
Attorney General [email via DOJ];
Sixth Circuit;
Various News services [email];
Posted upon the Peoples' counsel web site;[peoplescounsel.orgfree.com]
Posted upon peoplescounsel blog for public copy and Notice
And elsewhere

end of response

REFERENCED ORDER