COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY CALLOWAY CIRCUIT COURT

Comes now Maurice Edward, Brahier, on behalf of the supposed defendant to place objection to Quash of Subpoenas and Dismissal of the purported case, and to submit Notice of Intent to Appeal to the other Agents of COMMONWEALTH (for all the good that will do).

IN RE, quash of Subpoenas:

1. The Subpoena requests were not oppressive under Article 26 and Articles 1., 2., 3. 4., 7., 9., 10., 11., 12., 13., 14., 17., 18., 19., 25., of The Constitution of the State of Kentucky. These demand protection of the inherent and inalienable Rights of the People, and demand true and proper due process of Law, and specifically state that the People have the unquestionable Right to abolish, reform, review, or what ever they wish, to and of their government. The ORDER therefore stands outside of the authority afforded to the government to erect Rules, and or otherwise supposedly creating such exclusions, or otherwise, against such.
2. The Attorney/judge appears to be acting in concert with the other COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY Attorneys to prevent access and review by the People and the supposed defendant for evidence and information regarding the actions of government against the People, the State, and the several States. The authority of government does not extend to this point. When matters in the Court indicate abusive, discriminative, collusive, or other activities perpetrated against the People, government must produce it's documents, information and other for "a day of reckoning". Nothing out-laws, inhibits, destroys or interferes with the People's authority.
3. Wherefore, the ORDER is a deliberate attempt to deceive the People and any accused of their Rights, and can not stand under review by a Lawful and constitutional Court and judge(s).

Working from information received from the Clerk of the Court regarding a Dismissal, he does not yet have the document in his possesion

IN RE: the ORDER OF DISMISSAL

1. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY brought action while the supposed accused was residing in the State of Kentucky. It had also previously found, through deception of the jury and refusal to provide constitutional protections and Rights, that a misnomer/nom de guerre MAURICE E. BRAHIER was a felon, in violation of some supposed law of COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY while failing to prove the issue according to it own supposed law and its inclusions.
2. Due to fraudulent obtaining of the original jurisdiction in the Civil action, and the deliberately collusive and or unconstitutional activities occurring in the supposed lawful jury trial, a natural person, Maurice Edward, Brahier, is now held as a felon by other supposed governments and States. And is therefore subject to prosecution in other States as a supposed enhanced felon (persistent felon).
3. Maurice Edward, Brahier, is not a fool or ignorant of Law. He realizes that this supposed dismissal has been done so that the "Full faith and credit" of the Constitutions is applied in any other State to the unlawful and unconstitutional activities of COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY (he received this same treatment from and in Ohio). The Attorneys of governments use this ruse (constitutional protection of the People, now used as a tool to protect unconstitutional activities occurring in the States) across the several States to force the parties of this corruption to be essentially defenseless in any other State (one must attack such judgements in the State which issued such).
4. Since COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY has brought another action, and has attempted to bring enhanced sentencing of this supposed violation proceeding under the presumed lawful judgement, this matter WILL continue until Maurice Edward, Brahier, can relieve himself from the original unlawfully obtained judgements, through review by the jury or otherwise, in the State which committed such violations of his Rights and the Constitutions of the State and Nation. Therefore this supposed ORDER will be removed, and Maurice Edward, Brahier, will be afforded the opportunity to relieve himself from this supposed felon stature. The Court and judge were directed to these matters previously, and in Notices and Advisement-Facts.doc and other Notices and other upon the record. The Court and judge may not work to the corruption of these issues. The jury has the distinct Right to review the factual conditions occurring in the supposed previous trial.
5. Further, since COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY has disabled Maurice Edward, Brahier, and since the supposed ORDER of this Agency (BOARD OF CLAIMS) of COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY also stands outside of the constitutional protections and Rights of Maurice Edward, Brahier, and it IS a factor of this supposed violation by some misnomer/nom de guerre MAURICE E. BRAHIER or MAURICE EDWARD BRAHIER for which COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY then brought supposed criminal charges against, this State would be the proper State for review, as the information, evidence, and witnesses are readily available in Kentucky, not Ohio. Again this ruse of "Full faith and credit" is apparently being used by this Agent/judge of COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY to effectuate fraud or other abusive or heinous activity upon any other State and Maurice Edward, Brahier.

Therefore, this ORDER can not withstand review. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY brought this action, it must now supply the jury or otherwise, to relieve Maurice Edward, Brahier, from this felon status, and for his injuries and damage caused during his involuntary servitude/false imprisonment.