A set of jurisdictional questions for the court - defendant/respondent standing only
These are NOT recommendations or legal advise, these are "thought process" materials. Only you can determine whether you wish to follow this principle.
Here is the sample QUESTIONS OF LAW which could be submitted to any court into which you might be brought PRIOR to answering any complaint against you. It should be submitted AFTER your Notice of STANDING and RULING LAW, and WITH the other set of specific questions [Interrogatories] to the "plaintiff". Remember to first establish your local state common law via your own research.
The court attorney/judge MUST answer all questions of Law, or they violate Civil and/or criminal Rules, due process, and Supreme Court Rulings.
CAUTION: this WILL make the judge upset, they do NOT like to be limited to any specific jurisdiction or set of Laws, nor to define the applicable Laws and jurisdiction.
The prosecutor [the judge's esquire] will attack the
presentation, or the judge will attempt to strike it or ignore
it. Stiking it is a criminal act done WITHOUT jurisdiction, as it
has yet to be established and has failed to provide your Right to
answers for a proper reply and defense.
Notices are NOT pleas or Motions, which grant jurisdiction. This
is IN LIMINE activity.
Also by Rule and Law, the prosecutor or plaintiff can NOT answer
the court's questions as that would indicate the court and
prosecutor are "one and the same", "working together". Leaving
avenue to remove the action to an impartial forum.
No answers? This leaves you with various avenues:
- 1. Immediate Appeal for failing to establish the jurisdiction the court is using verses the plaintiff's desired jurisdiction. It does NOT matter that it may be a court of general jurisdiction, it must still be established WHICH jurisdiction and Law it is using by both the court AND the prosecutor or plaintiff.
- 2. NOTICE OF LACK OF JURISDICTION, again due to failure to establish jurisdiction. "upon Notice by either of the parties that the court lacks jurisdiction, the court shall dismiss the matter". General jurisdiction is not an excuse, as that jurisdiction has not been established.
- 3. NOTICE OF VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS REQUIREMENTS, submitted with Notice of Appeal. The court must follow civil and/or criminal Rules, a failure to do so establishes deliberate violation of due process.
- 4. NOTICE OF OBJECTION. Submit upon the face of the record, ALL violations of Rights and Law which has occurred by failing to answer these questions. If the judge or magistrate attempts to make a Ruling or does, then Appeal. A judge may not Rule on matters in which they are in error, doing so establishes immediate Right to Appeal.
- 5. If it is a Jury trial, and it makes it that far, submit the questions, the Rules, Laws, and Constitutional clauses which demand they be answered WITH the actual proper answers, TO THE JURY, and ask THEM for a Summary judgement based upon these violations of Law and Right BY THE COURT. Caution: this is a hard road to follow as the Jury is generally ignorant of what your Rights are, and the judge is likely to attempt to disallow this evidence presented to the jury. There again establishing immediate ability to Appeal. Objection MUST be placed regarding this refusal, after which [on which] a Stay is requested. Appeal is then addressed regarding this activity [denial of due process, rights at jury trial- jury to receive all relevant evidence] by the court.
Questions of Law to be answered prior to entry before the court or tribunal IN LIMINE SITIS
The recorder and clerk will make due notice upon the record of the numbered questions and corresponding answers without further request. You will supply a verbatim copy of these specifics to me.
QUESTIONS
1. Is this a tribunal of record?
Answer
2. Is this the Constitutional Court allowed therein?
Answer
3. What type and style of Court is this?
Answer
4. Answer these specific questions as applicable.
A. If tort or Equity:
1. What contract or statute does this court presume to proceed under or by?
Answer
2. How does this apply to me?
Answer
B. If Military:
1. What section of military code specifically applies to me?
Answer
2. How can Military Law and Code be applied to non-military personel?
Answer
C. If Admiralty or Maritime:
1. What Law or contract does the tribunal rely upon to continue?
Answer
2. How or why does the Court presume this applies to me?
Answer
3. Where does the Constitution state Admiralty applies?
Answer
D. If common law:
1. What or which purported set of common law does the Court continue under?
Answer
2. Is this International Common Law?
Answer
3. Is this Constitutional common Law?
Answer
4. Is this the common Law that existed and is required under the Constitution?
Answer
E. .If Statute Law:
1. Does the Tribunal claim that the Statutes replace or remove Constitutional common Law?
Answer
2. How exactly does Statute law take precedent over Constitutional Law?
Answer
3. Where do Statute Laws get their authority?
Answer
4. How are Statute Laws created?
Answer
5. Does the tribunal contend that Statutes are created by the Legislature?
Answer
5. I have demanded my Rights as stated my declarations and Notices, as found in the Constitutions, does the Court or Tribunal intent to provide them?
Answer
The Court will attach additional pages as necessary, with headings and numbered and lettered indications, for complete and concise answer to these questions
Questions presented to the Court or Tribunal prior to entry, by [your name].
END
Serve this process to all parties, including the opposing party and their attorney/representative.
You must include a self addressed stamped envelope for the returned copy, as the matter has not been established under jurisdictional requirements yet, hence forma pauperous jurisdiction has not been established as well.
Again, a good understanding of the Law, local/State/Federal Rules, Rules of Evidence, and local procedural Rules all must be taken under consideration for this style of activity.
As is generally heard in the legal circle: only a fool has theirself as a client, which equates to only a fool represents themself. This page is not legal advise, but for informational purposes only.
SEE:Disclaimer Notice and Legal Notice