Peoples' Counsel Home
Contact Us
Ruffstuff's Blog
Peoples' Counsel Blog
Site Map
Expose` of Crimes Volume 1 11-09-99
Expose` Of Crimes Volume II 12-19-02
Expose` of Crimes Volume III 02-26-04
Expose` Of Crimes Volume IV
Expose` of Crimes Volume V 04-11-04
Expose` of Crimes Volume VI 04-23-04
Expose` of Crimes Volume VIII 02-25-04
5-03-CV-258R, the final federal case before judicial complaints and cases
12-27-04 Peoples Response to southern Ohio USDC refusals & corruption
01-05-05 DCUSA activities
01-29-05 Response to refusal to file
Response to defendant Ovington 02-09-05 ORDERS
04-27-05 defendant Rice ORDER Dismissing Demand for Grand Jury & Certification of Questions to The Supreme Court
Peoples' 05-26-05 Response to fraudulent Order
PDF of 6th Circuit attempt to assign request as Appeal
Response to 6th Circuit attempt to assign request as Appeal
Kentucky Supreme Court Case 98-SC-916-AO The People vs COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
1998 Kentucky attempt to prosecute for persisent offender with criminally obtained judgements
Ohio 1991 to present, courts, AGENCIES, and other
Senate Report 93-549 Termination of The National Emergency
sunset_mod.png Peoples' Counsel presents:
the "real world" of Law, Justice and government
A Peoples' Counsel Website
link to http://peoplescounsel.orgfree.com




Maurice Edward, Brahier, a private party of the people, of sovereignty


Commonwealth of Kentucky

Calloway Circuit Court

In re:

Maurice Edward, Brahier a private person in sovereignty,

Petitioner,

and

de facto COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY AGENTS,

Respondent


)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 98-CR-00120

Demand to Proceed in Forma Pauperis

Notices: This includes no waivers of Rights, nor does this waiver, insinuate, or otherwise; jurisdictional questions and others as has been demanded answered by the Court, judges, and de facto COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY;

AGENTS OF COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY have ten days in which to respond or Appeal(s) shall be docketed and expedited

Comes now the petitioner, Maurice Edward, Brahier, to fulfill the purported requirement of an ORDER to allow him to proceed in forma pauperis during and pursuant to the supposed criminal action, and Appeal(s), which de facto COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY and or its AGENTS, AGENCIES, representatives, and or otherwise, have filed within the corporate court.

It appears that the assumptions, pursuant to various Acts created by the supposed peoples' representatives, have extended the powers of the court and judges beyond the allowances within the peoples' Constitution and the peoples' actual wishes. The gravest errors appear to be the various "judiciary Acts" such as occurred in 1927 and thereafter, which rely on the integrity .of judges to protect the people from "power grabs", unconstitutional Acts and actions, and other unlawful and unconstitutional activities, which has not occurred.

Pursuant to the unwarrantable powers of these various Acts, which have allowed the essential and inherent Rights of the people to be diminished, excluded, denied, destroyed, demeaned, and at times, merely extended as benefits and or privileges, solely based under the supposed wishes of some judge, I come before the court to demand this order. It shall be stated as retro-active for proper appeal (as Noticed) of these atrocities and aggressive acts being committed and expedited. The Court may refer to the attached affidavit for additional supposed requirements and or cause.

NOTICES: I waiver no inherent, inalienable, known, or other Rights, and do not waiver any questions that will be answered by the Courts, judges, and COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, before proceeding further. I do not accept any attempts to: diminish; destroy; hamper; harm; deny; remove; or waiver, any and all questions concerning jurisdiction, style, and other, as appears within the questions before the now readily apparent AGENTS of COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY.

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY's AGENTS shall respond within 10 days or the order shall issue sui-sponte and the clerk shall docket and forward the Appeal(s).

The clerk of the Court of Appeals has answered on two (2) occasions, the questions concerning Rights of the people at appeal, as they have been destroyed by the judiciary in its purported RULES under which he must comply for acceptance of appeals. It, therefore, lays for the judges to support their claim of Constitutional authority to destroy, hamper, harm, deny, or other of like nature, the Rights of the people, in any court, be it the de facto corporate Courts or the peoples', when they are sworn and under Oath to not do so.

signature block removed

Maurice Edward, Brahier, a private party of the people, of sovereignty


Certification of Delivery

Take notice that the under-signed has sent this document entitled Calloway Circuit- Forma Pauperis.doc and attachment(s) to:

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY AGENT and ATTORNEY, Michael D. Ward at his address of record;

On this ____________________ day of the __________________ month in the Nineteen hundredth and Ninety-ninth year, Anno Domini, via regular USPS messenger service.

signature block removed

xxxxxxxxxx

The city of xxxxxxxxxxx within Ohio


Google
 
Web peoplescounsel.orgfree.com
Search for
Get a Free Search Engine for Your Web Site
sitelevel.whatuseek image
© Copyright 2005. All rights reserved. Contact: M.Brahier

Free Web Hosting